The Death of Expressed Personhood: A Neuroscientific Model to Solve Our Greatest Bioethical Dilemmas.

Defining "death" is central to addressing bioethical questions. Brain death is the most prominent legal definition of "death" in the US. Nonetheless, there seem to be notable difficulties with the notion of brain death that makes it inadequate to respond to ambiguous bioethical inquires. Jeff McMaha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Dialogue (00122246) Vol. 55; no. 1; pp. 1 - 10
Autor principal: Ismail Kronemer, Sharif
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Phi Sigma Tau Oct2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=83201420&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 83201420
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00122246
        8WT0
      jtl: Dialogue (00122246)
      issn: 00122246
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2012
      vid: 55
      iid: 1
      pid: 52582
      pub: Phi Sigma Tau
    artinfo:
      ui: 83201420
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 508KB
      tig:
        atl: The Death of Expressed Personhood: A Neuroscientific Model to Solve Our Greatest Bioethical Dilemmas.
      aug:
        au: Ismail Kronemer, Sharif
        affil: Ohio Wesleyan University
      su:
        Brain death
        Personality (Theory of knowledge)
        Bioethics
        McMahan, Jeff
        Neurosciences
        United States
      sug:
        subj:
          United States
          Brain death
          Personality (Theory of knowledge)
          Bioethics
          McMahan, Jeff
          Neurosciences
      ab: Defining "death" is central to addressing bioethical questions. Brain death is the most prominent legal definition of "death" in the US. Nonetheless, there seem to be notable difficulties with the notion of brain death that makes it inadequate to respond to ambiguous bioethical inquires. Jeff McMahan aims to mend these limitations by positing a second notion of death: death of personhood. Although intuitive, the death of personhood does not acknowledge contemporary neuroscience research and posits dualist notions which we have good reason to doubt. Instead, a third notion of death is necessary: the death of expressed personhood.
      pubtype: Periodical
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Dialogue (00122246) is the property of Phi Sigma Tau and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Dialogue (00122246)
      holder: Phi Sigma Tau
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2012
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N