Against the Tedium of Immortality.

In a well-known paper, Bernard Williams argues that an immortal life would not be worth living, for it would necessarily become boring. I examine the implications for the boredom thesis of three human traits that have received insufficient attention in the literature on Williams’ paper. First, human...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Journal of Philosophical Studies Vol. 20; no. 5; pp. 623 - 645
Autor principal: Bruckner, DonaldW.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Dec2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=83729026&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 83729026
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09672559
        5BE
      jtl: International Journal of Philosophical Studies
      issn: 09672559
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2012
      vid: 20
      iid: 5
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        83729026
        10.1080/09672559.2012.713383
      ppf: 623
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 116KB
      tig:
        atl: Against the Tedium of Immortality.
      aug:
        au: Bruckner, DonaldW.
        affil: Penn State University - New Kensington, United States
      su:
        Immortality of the soul
        Williams, Bernard, 1929-2003
        Boredom
        Attention
        Personality
      sug:
        subj:
          Immortality of the soul
          Williams, Bernard, 1929-2003
          Boredom
          Attention
          Personality
      keyword:
        Bernard Williams
        boredom
        character
        immortality
        Makropulos
      ab: In a well-known paper, Bernard Williams argues that an immortal life would not be worth living, for it would necessarily become boring. I examine the implications for the boredom thesis of three human traits that have received insufficient attention in the literature on Williams’ paper. First, human memory decays, so humans would be entertained and driven by things that they experienced long before but had forgotten. Second, even if memory does not decay to the extent necessary to ward off boredom, once-satisfied desires often return after a sufficient period of time. Eternity would always contain sufficient time for our desires to rejuvenate. Third, even if too many of our desires were satisfied but not yet rejuvenated, we can expect that human ingenuity would continue to invent new pursuits, pastimes, careers, and ways of life that would prevent us from becoming bored as we moved from one to another. Finally, I consider and respond to several objections, including the claims that as much variety as I propose to be put into an eternal life is inconsistent with having one character throughout one’s life and that the sort of character change and memory decay I postulate is inconsistent with personal identity.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of International Journal of Philosophical Studies is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: International Journal of Philosophical Studies
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2012
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N