Theorizing emotions with Judith Butler: within and beyond the courtroom.

Focusing upon emotion entails a potential challenge, both to hegemonic notions of the human subject and to social inquiry. That challenge consists in the opportunity afforded by research on emotion to radicalize the decentering of the subject that is at the heart of poststructuralist theorizing. An...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Rethinking History Vol. 16; no. 2; pp. 221 - 241
Autor principal: Braunmühl, Caroline
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jun2012
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=83741431&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 83741431
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13642529
        5C5
      jtl: Rethinking History
      issn: 13642529
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2012
      vid: 16
      iid: 2
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        83741431
        10.1080/13642529.2012.681192
      ppf: 221
      ppct: 20
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 136KB
      tig:
        atl: Theorizing emotions with Judith Butler: within and beyond the courtroom.
      aug:
        au: Braunmühl, Caroline
        affil: Independent Scholar, Berlin, Germany
      sug:
      keyword:
        critique of ‘identity’
        critique of 'identity'
        emotions
        melancholia/melancholy
        performativity
        poststructuralism
        the subject
      ab: Focusing upon emotion entails a potential challenge, both to hegemonic notions of the human subject and to social inquiry. That challenge consists in the opportunity afforded by research on emotion to radicalize the decentering of the subject that is at the heart of poststructuralist theorizing. An opportunity in virtue of which certain biases that continue to be instantiated in contemporary theorizations of the subject – poststructuralist ones included – could be overcome: namely, biases towards the cognitive as well as the active, as against the passive-receptive, dimensions of being alive. These biases, I argue, unproductively circumscribe our understanding of self, thereby constraining the possibilities for our ‘becoming otherwise’ (Butler 2004, 173); an endeavor I would define as being at the heart of poststructuralism qua transformative ethical project. In particular, I address several writings by Butler to argue that the increasing turn to emotions potentially confronts us with our exposure to what we cannot control; with our vulnerability. A vulnerability which the said cognitive (i.e., rationalist) and praxeological biases of contemporary theorizing – which are entailed in but not limited to poststructuralism – risk disavowing and devaluing, thereby nurturing a residual ethos of (self-)control that is contrary to the aspirations of poststructuralism, and that constitutes us as defensive, rigid, masculinist subjects. However, these ethico-political possibilities of an ‘emotional turn’ within social inquiry are unlikely to be realized as long as we understand it in terms of a mere topic for research; without opening up to its implications for what we understand to be the very point of such inquiry. The potential promise of a prospective ‘emotion studies’ thus sits side by side with the possibility that the challenge it poses will be contained in virtue of a conventional mode of conducting such research, which risks stabilizing rather than unsettling the hegemonic psycho-social order, partly in virtue of an identitarian account of the human subject.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Rethinking History is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Rethinking History
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2012
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N