The Witch-Family in Elizabethan and Jacobean Print Culture.
This paper argues that a new stereotype about witches emerged in print culture beginning in the late sixteenth century and intensifying during the early decades of the seventeenth century. This new image--of the witch as member of a witch-family--deserves recognition along with more familiar stereot...
| Publicado en: | Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies Vol. 13; no. 1; pp. 4 - 32 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
University of Pennsylvania Press
2013
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=84319308&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 84319308 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 15310485 DBLW jtl: Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies issn: 15310485 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2013 vid: 13 iid: 1 pid: 4636 pub: University of Pennsylvania Press artinfo: ui: 84319308 10.1353/jem.2013.0003 ppf: 4 ppct: 28 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 612KB tig: atl: The Witch-Family in Elizabethan and Jacobean Print Culture. aug: au: WILLIS, DEBORAH su: Witches Witchcraft Print culture Stereotypes Covens Reign of Elizabeth I, England, 1558-1603 Tudor Period, Great Britain, 1485-1603 Early modern English literature sug: subj: Witches Witchcraft Print culture Stereotypes Covens Reign of Elizabeth I, England, 1558-1603 Tudor Period, Great Britain, 1485-1603 Early modern English literature ab: This paper argues that a new stereotype about witches emerged in print culture beginning in the late sixteenth century and intensifying during the early decades of the seventeenth century. This new image--of the witch as member of a witch-family--deserves recognition along with more familiar stereotypes of the solitary witch and the coven or conspiratorial cult. Though not as enduring or pervasive, the stereotype of the witch-family carried some significantly different implications than the others. If both solitary witches and covens were typically figured in terms of antithesis and inversion--as disruptors of traditional hierarchies of gender, family, community, and state--the witch-family was represented as dangerous because of its most normative features. While legal-documentary pamphlets of the Elizabethan period contain accounts that show family relationships among witches, they do little to call attention to or comment on them. Jacobean pamphlets, however, fashion the witch-family into a new kind of threat. Witch-parents behaved like proper parents, seeing to the protection and education of their young. They taught their children a kind of trade, passing on magical techniques and familiar spirits the way other parents passed on agricultural skills and livestock. Witch-children dutifully obeyed their parents and followed their instructions. Witchcraft therefore could spread through communities and across generations by means of behaviors that were viewed as godly in other contexts. Jacobean authors responded to this threat through rhetorical strategies of irony and satire, mocking the perverse order of witch-families, associating them with a hereditary, lower-class "baseness," and contrasting them with the genteel virtues of their often-wealthier victims, whose deaths would be avenged by the providential workings of a godly justice system. Thus these pamphlets contributed to an evolving discourse about families of the "undeserving poor" whose hereditary "baseness" might combine with an unholy education to express itself in a variety of criminal or anti-social behaviors. Read against the grain, however, these pamphlets might also have suggested the potentially subversive function of family order and loving family ties when parents subscribed to resistant ideologies and schooled their children in them. Witch-families were crime-families, a part of a shadowy outlaw or reprobate class, but they also resembled families of recusants, aristocratic rebels, and radical sects. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies is the property of University of Pennsylvania Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies holder: University of Pennsylvania Press dt: @attributes: year: 2013 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|