RACIONALUMO IR TEISINGUMO SĄJUNGOS PROBLEMA JOHNO RAWLSO „POLITINIAME LIBERALIZME“.
The article deals with Rawlsian attempts to offer a theoretical model for universal "political, not metaphysical" order, based on the ideas of rationality and justice specifically defined. My point is to reveal the inner inconsistency in the very notion of political liberalism showing that its funda...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 82; pp. 126 - 139 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2012
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=84319562&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 84319562 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2012 vid: 82 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 84319562 10.15388/Problemos.2012.0.731 ppf: 126 ppct: 13 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 583KB tig: atl: RACIONALUMO IR TEISINGUMO SĄJUNGOS PROBLEMA JOHNO RAWLSO „POLITINIAME LIBERALIZME“. aug: au: Vasiliauskaitė, Nida affil: Vilniaus Gedimino technikos universiteto, Kūrybinių industrijų fakultetas, Filosofijos ir politologijos katedra, Saulėtekio al. 11, SRC 712 a, LT-10223 Vilnius su: Problem solving Reason Mathematical models Political ethics Political philosophy Presupposition (Logic) Neutrality sug: subj: Problem solving Reason Mathematical models Political ethics Political philosophy Presupposition (Logic) Neutrality keyword: fundamentism fundamentizmas justice neutrality neutralumas political liberalism politinis liberalizmas racionalumas rationality teisingumas fundamentizmas neutralumas politinis liberalizmas racionalumas teisingumas ab: The article deals with Rawlsian attempts to offer a theoretical model for universal "political, not metaphysical" order, based on the ideas of rationality and justice specifically defined. My point is to reveal the inner inconsistency in the very notion of political liberalism showing that its fundamental presuppositions -- the distinctions of politics / morals and reasonable / rational -- are flawed. Which means that as a project built on two distinct in kind sources of normativity trying to "make them one" without damaging their logical autonomy, political liberalism is deemed to generate inconsistencies and cannot be saved by any "cosmetic changes". Straipsnyje analizuojamos Johno Rawlso pastangos sukurti „politinės, bet ne metafizinės“ tvarkos modelį, kuris tenkintų specifiškai apibrėžtus „racionalumo“ bei „teisingumo“ kriterijus, ir išryškinamas šio modelio vidinis prieštaringumas. Parodoma, kokie problemiški yra pagrindiniai „politinio liberalizmo“ konstravimo įrankiai -- politikos / moralės ir protingumo / racionalumo perskyros -- ir teigiama, jog koncepcijos nenuoseklumų priežastis yra principinė, ji glūdi pačiame Rawlso sumanyme susieti, bet nesutapatinti du autonomiškus ir heterogeniškus normatyvumo šaltinius; o atsisakius kurio nors vieno „politinis liberalizmas“ apskritai suirtų. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: Lithuanian refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2012 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|