Regimes of Mobility Across the Globe.
Mobility studies emerged from a postmodern moment in which global ‘flows’ of capital, people and objects were increasingly noted and celebrated. Within this new scholarship, categories of migrancy are all seen through the same analytical lens. This article andRegimes of Mobility: Imaginaries and Rel...
| Published in: | Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies Vol. 39; no. 2; pp. 183 - 201 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Feb2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=84918246&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 84918246 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 1369183X 56F jtl: Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies issn: 1369183X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Feb2013 vid: 39 iid: 2 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 84918246 10.1080/1369183X.2013.723253 ppf: 183 ppct: 18 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 123KB tig: atl: Regimes of Mobility Across the Globe. aug: au: Glick Schiller, Nina Salazar, NoelB. affil: Social Anthropology Research Institute for Cosmopolitan Culture at the University of Manchester Anthropology Cultural Mobilities Research (CuMoRe), University of Leuven su: Emigration & immigration Transnationalism Ethnology Anthropology Nationalism Equality sug: subj: Emigration & immigration Transnationalism Ethnology Anthropology Nationalism Equality keyword: Ethnography Immobility Methodological Nationalism Migration Regimes of Mobility ab: Mobility studies emerged from a postmodern moment in which global ‘flows’ of capital, people and objects were increasingly noted and celebrated. Within this new scholarship, categories of migrancy are all seen through the same analytical lens. This article andRegimes of Mobility: Imaginaries and Relationalities of Power, the special issue ofJEMSit introduces, build on, as well as critique, past and present studies of mobility. In so doing, this issue challenges conceptual orientations built on binaries of difference that have impeded analyses of the interrelationship between mobility and stasis. These include methodological nationalism, which counterpoises concepts of internal and international movement and native and foreigner, and consequently normalises stasis. Instead, the issue offers a regimes of mobility framework that addresses the relationships between mobility and immobility, localisation and transnational connection, experiences and imaginaries of migration, and rootedness and cosmopolitan openness. The introduction highlights how, within this framework and its emphasis on social fields of differential power, the contributors to this collection ethnographically explore the disparities, inequalities, racialised representations and national mythscapes that facilitate and legitimate differential mobility and fixity. Although the authors examine nation-state building processes, their analysis is not confined by national boundaries. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd dt: @attributes: year: 2013 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|