Objects and Events: linguistic and philosophical notions of 'thingness'
The article deals with the differences of the notion of 'object' or 'thing' in natural languages, concluding that some languages are by their structure more object-biased while others are more event-biased and proceeds to analyse how two common Japanese words, mono and koto, both meaning 'thing', ha...
| Publicado en: | Asian Philosophy Vol. 12; no. 2; pp. 97 - 109 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Jul2002
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=8526269&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 8526269 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 09552367 AOO jtl: Asian Philosophy issn: 09552367 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jul2002 vid: 12 iid: 2 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 8526269 10.1080/0955236022000043847 ppf: 97 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 144KB tig: atl: Objects and Events: linguistic and philosophical notions of 'thingness' aug: au: Raud, Rein su: Object (Philosophy) Events (Philosophy) Anthropological linguistics sug: subj: Object (Philosophy) Events (Philosophy) Anthropological linguistics ab: The article deals with the differences of the notion of 'object' or 'thing' in natural languages, concluding that some languages are by their structure more object-biased while others are more event-biased and proceeds to analyse how two common Japanese words, mono and koto, both meaning 'thing', have been treated in 20th-century Japanese thought, notably in the philosophical works of Watsuji Tetsurô, Ide Takashi, Hiromatsu Wataru and Kimura Bin. All of these thinkers represent different schools and trends (Watsuji could be called a cultural particularist, Ide was an Aristotle scholar, Hiromatsu a Marxist and Kimura is a psychiatrist), but come to similar conclusions in this respect, allowing us to regard event-biased and object-biased linguistic constructions as manifestations of two different, but equally necessary cognitive faculties. pubtype: Review doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Asian Philosophy is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Asian Philosophy holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd dt: @attributes: year: 2002 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|