Evaluating new severity dimensions in the DSM-5 for bulimic syndromes using mixture modeling.

Objective: Proposed DSM-5 severity dimensions reveal ambiguity regarding the extent to which certain features define boundaries between similar diagnoses or represent underlying dimensions within a broader category of bulimic syndromes. The current study utilized a novel mixed modeling approach that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Journal of Eating Disorders Vol. 46; no. 2; pp. 108 - 119
Autores principales: Keel, Pamela K., Crosby, Ross D., Hildebrandt, Thomas B., Haedt‐Matt, Alissa A., Gravener, Julie A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Mar2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=85386869&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 85386869
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02763478
        IJD
      jtl: International Journal of Eating Disorders
      issn: 02763478
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2013
      vid: 46
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        85386869
        10.1002/eat.22050
      ppf: 108
      ppct: 11
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Evaluating new severity dimensions in the DSM-5 for bulimic syndromes using mixture modeling.
      aug:
        au:
          Keel, Pamela K.
          Crosby, Ross D.
          Hildebrandt, Thomas B.
          Haedt‐Matt, Alissa A.
          Gravener, Julie A.
        affil:
          Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida
          Neuropsychiatric Research Institute and Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Fargo, North Dakota
          Eating and Weight Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York
          Department of Psychology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
          Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
      su:
        Anthropometry
        Interviewing
        Classification of mental disorders
        Self-evaluation
        Sound recordings
        Bulimia diagnosis
        Chi-squared test
        Factor analysis
        Latent structure analysis
        Research methodology
        Research funding
        Statistics
        Data analysis
        Body mass index
        Inter-observer reliability
        Severity of illness index
        Data analysis software
        Descriptive statistics
      sug:
        subj:
          Anthropometry
          Interviewing
          Classification of mental disorders
          Self-evaluation
          Sound recordings
          Integrated Record Production/Distribution
          Sound recording merchant wholesalers
          Record Production
          Bulimia diagnosis
          Chi-squared test
          Factor analysis
          Latent structure analysis
          Research methodology
          Research funding
          Statistics
          Data analysis
          Body mass index
          Inter-observer reliability
          Severity of illness index
          Data analysis software
          Descriptive statistics
      keyword:
        bulimia nervosa
        eating disorder not otherwise specified
        factor mixture analysis
        nosology
        bulimia nervosa
        eating disorder not otherwise specified
        factor mixture analysis
        nosology
      ab: Objective: Proposed DSM-5 severity dimensions reveal ambiguity regarding the extent to which certain features define boundaries between similar diagnoses or represent underlying dimensions within a broader category of bulimic syndromes. The current study utilized a novel mixed modeling approach that can simultaneously model latent dimensions and latent categories to address this ambiguity. Method: Data from structured clinical interviews in 528 adult participants were analyzed. Results: A three-class solution with one severity dimension that was invariant across groups provided the best-fitting model. Both latent Classes 1 and 2 included bulimic syndromes but were distinguished by greater purging and weight phobia in latent Class 1. Latent Class 3 resembled a noneating disorder class. External validation analyses supported significant differences among empirically derived groups. Discussion: Weight phobia contributes to categorical distinctiveness among bulimic syndromes whereas other features (purging, binge eating, and weight) may do so only in specific combinations. Uniform severity criteria may be appropriate across bulimic syndromes. © 2012 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2013)
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N