They wrote on wood. The case for a hieroglyphic scribal tradition on wooden writing boards in Hittite Anatolia.

The wooden writing boards frequently mentioned in Hittite texts have given rise to much debate, mostly regarding the scale on which they were used and the type of script that was written on them (cuneiform or hieroglyphs). In this paper, the evidence for the use of wooden writing boards in Hittite A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Anatolian Studies (British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara) Vol. 61; pp. 21 - 35
Autor principal: Waal, Willemijn
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:The wooden writing boards frequently mentioned in Hittite texts have given rise to much debate, mostly regarding the scale on which they were used and the type of script that was written on them (cuneiform or hieroglyphs). In this paper, the evidence for the use of wooden writing boards in Hittite Anatolia will be (re-)evaluated. It will be argued that they were used for private and economic documents, and that they were written on in Anatolian hieroglyphs. Important indications of this are the distinct terms consistently used in connection with writing on wood, which point to a separate scribal tradition. Further, the form and nature of the hieroglyphic script itself and the fact that it survived after the fall of the Hittite empire confirm that the script must have been widely employed. It is thus proposed that two parallel scribal traditions existed in Hittite Anatolia: a (lost) hieroglyphic tradition on wooden writing boards used for private and daily economic records, and a Hittite cuneiform tradition reserved for palace administration.