THE DISTINCT AND AUTONOMOUS WORLD OF THE ORAL LEGEND: OLD AND NEW READINGS.
The core hypothesis in this text is that oral tradition, too, as a signi? cant component of cultural identity and the main determinant of the folkloristic profession, is a continuous ?- historical and contemporary ?- process of multi-layered interpretation of repetitive procedures and symbols in the...
| Publicado en: | Croatian Journal of Ethnology & Folklore Research / Narodna Umjetnost Vol. 47; no. 1; pp. 91 - 110 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Institute of Ethnology & Folklore Research
2010
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=85917155&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 85917155 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 05472504 3PT2 jtl: Croatian Journal of Ethnology & Folklore Research / Narodna Umjetnost issn: 05472504 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2010 vid: 47 iid: 1 pid: 37460 pub: Institute of Ethnology & Folklore Research artinfo: ui: 85917155 ppf: 91 ppct: 19 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 195KB tig: atl: THE DISTINCT AND AUTONOMOUS WORLD OF THE ORAL LEGEND: OLD AND NEW READINGS. aug: au: MARKS, LJILJANA affil: Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Research, Zagreb su: Folklore Cultural identity Cultural property Folklore & history Folklorists History Croatia sug: subj: Croatia Folklore Cultural identity Cultural property Folklore & history Folklorists History keyword: 19th century 20th century interpretation legend mithology retraditionalisation tradition 19. st 20. st Hrvatska interpretacija mitologija predaja retradicionalizacija tradicija ab: The core hypothesis in this text is that oral tradition, too, as a signi? cant component of cultural identity and the main determinant of the folkloristic profession, is a continuous ?- historical and contemporary ?- process of multi-layered interpretation of repetitive procedures and symbols in the human community, and not an inherited cluster of unquestionable facts, spiritual values and completed texts. The interaction between processes of tradition and re-traditionalisation in shaping the manifold aspects of cultural identity is examined on the basis of notations of oral prose, largely mythic and historical legends. The text proceeds from the assumption that tradition is not a set of unchangeable values but rather a creative process by which each individual, generation, writer of notations, researcher or author de? nes his/her heritage and identity. Therefore, the paper scrutinises which content becomes part of oral tradition in particular time periods, how is does so (how is it reshaped), in which contexts and the signi? cance given it to, also depending on the ruling scholarly paradigms. The actual process of creating tradition is studied in that context, the tradition that people constantly shape and create, deconstruct and renew, perpetuating certain values and re-interpreting them in the search of supports for self-cognisance. Various interpretative levels of tradition, oral legend particularly, also depend, of course, on who is interpreting them, with which intent/purpose/objective; they depend on the conceptions and the value system of the community and the individual and on the social, cultural and political atmosphere. Glavna je hipoteza teksta da je i usmena tradicija, kao bitna sastavnica kulturnoga identiteta, i glavna odrednica folklorističke struke, kontinuirani (povijesni i suvremeni) proces višeslojne interpre tacijerepetitivnih postupaka i simbola u ljudskoj zajednici, a ne baštinjeni skup neupitnih &#injenica, duhovnih vrijednosti i dovr?šenih tekstova. Na zapisima usmene proze, poglavito mitskih i povijesnih predaja, razmatra se interakcija procesâ tradicije i retradicionalizacije u oblikovanju mnogostrukih aspekata kulturnog identiteta. Polazi se od pretpostavke da tradicija nije skup nepromjenljivih vrijednosti, nego kreativni proces kojim svaki pojedinac, nara?taj, zapisivač, istra?ivač ili književnik odreduje svoje kulturno naslijede i identitet. Stoga rad ispituje koji se sadržaji u pojedinim vremenskim razdobljima upisuju u usmenu tradiciju, kako se upisuju (preoblikuju), u kojim kontekstima i koja im se značenja pridaju, ovisno i o vladajućim znanstenim paradigmama. U tome se kontekstu propituje proces stvaranja tradicije, koju ljudi stalno oblikuju i stvaraju, razgraduju i obnavljaju, perpetuirajući neke vrijednosti i reinterpretirajući ih u potrazi za osloncima samospoznaje. Različite interpretativne razine tradicije, poglavito usmene predaje, ovise dakako i o tome tko je interpretira, s kojom namjerom/ svrhom/ciljem, ovise o predod?bama, vrijednosnom sustavu zajednice i pojedinca te o dru?štvenom, kulturnom i političkom ozračju. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Croatian Journal of Ethnology & Folklore Research / Narodna Umjetnost is the property of Institute of Ethnology & Folklore Research and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Croatian Journal of Ethnology & Folklore Research / Narodna Umjetnost holder: Institute of Ethnology & Folklore Research dt: @attributes: year: 2010 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|