Working Memory Capacity Does Not Always Support Future-Oriented Mind-Wandering.

To evaluate the claim that mind-wandering demands executive resources, and more specifically that people with better executive control will have the resources to engage in more future-oriented thought than will those with poorer executive control, we reanalyzed thought-report data from 2 independent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale Vol. 67; no. 1; pp. 41 - 51
Autores principales: McVay, Jennifer C., Unsworth, Nash, McMillan, Brittany D., Kane, Michael J.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Canadian Psychological Association Mar2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=85927498&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 85927498
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        11961961
        CJX
      jtl: Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale
      issn: 11961961
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2013
      vid: 67
      iid: 1
      pid: 98
      pub: Canadian Psychological Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        85927498
        10.1037/a0031252
      ppf: 41
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 101KB
      tig:
        atl: Working Memory Capacity Does Not Always Support Future-Oriented Mind-Wandering.
      aug:
        au:
          McVay, Jennifer C.
          Unsworth, Nash
          McMillan, Brittany D.
          Kane, Michael J.
        affil:
          Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro
          Department of Psychology, University of Oregon
      su:
        North Carolina
        Oregon
        Cognition
        College students
        Memory
        Task performance
        Goodness-of-fit tests
        Maximum likelihood statistics
        Descriptive statistics
      sug:
        subj:
          Cognition
          College students
          Memory
          Task performance
          North Carolina
          Oregon
          Goodness-of-fit tests
          Maximum likelihood statistics
          Descriptive statistics
      keyword:
        executive control
        individual differences
        mind-wandering
        working memory capacity
        capacité de la mémoire de travail
        différences individuelle
        maîtrise des ressources
        rêverie
        executive control
        individual differences
        mind-wandering
        working memory capacity
        capacité de la mémoire de travail
        différences individuelle
        maîtrise des ressources
        rêverie
      ab: To evaluate the claim that mind-wandering demands executive resources, and more specifically that people with better executive control will have the resources to engage in more future-oriented thought than will those with poorer executive control, we reanalyzed thought-report data from 2 independently conducted studies (J. C. McVay & M. J. Kane, 2012, Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 141, pp. 302-320; N. Unsworth & B. D. McMillan, in press, Mind-wandering and reading comprehension: Examining the roles of working memory capacity, interest, motivation, and topic experience, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition) on working memory capacity (WMC), mind-wandering, and reading comprehension. Both of these individual-differences studies assessed large samples of university subjects' WMC abilities via multiple tasks and probed their immediate thought content while reading; in reporting any task-unrelated thoughts (TUTs), subjects indicated whether those thoughts were about the future or the past, if applicable. In contrast to previously published findings indicating that higher WMC subjects mindwandered about the future more than did lower WMC subjects (B. Baird, J. Smallwood, & J. W. Schooler, 2011, Back to the future: Autobiographical planning and the functionality of mind-wandering, Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 20, pp. 1604-1611), we found only weak to modest negative correlations between WMC and future-oriented TUTs. If anything, our findings suggest that higher WMC subjects' TUTs were somewhat less often future-oriented than were lower WMC subjects'. Either WMC is not truly associated with mind-wandering about the future, or we have identified some important boundary conditions around that association.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N