Comparison of Computer Interface Devices for Persons With Severe Physical Disabilities.

This research employed a descriptive case study design to compare subjects' performance using three computer input devices: the Tongue Touch Keypad, the Head-Master, and the mouthstick. The sample consisted of four students with severe physical disabilities enrolled in an adaptive computer class at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Journal of Occupational Therapy Vol. 47; no. 11; pp. 1022 - 1031
Autores principales: Lau, Cynthia, O'Leary, Stephanie
Formato: case study pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: American Occupational Therapy Association Nov1993
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=86055194&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 86055194
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02729490
        44I
      jtl: American Journal of Occupational Therapy
      issn: 02729490
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov1993
      vid: 47
      iid: 11
      pid: 6680
      pub: American Occupational Therapy Association
      place: North Bethesda, Maryland
    artinfo:
      ui:
        86055194
        86055194
        108008350
        10.5014/ajot.47.11.1022
        86055194
      ppf: 1022
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Comparison of Computer Interface Devices for Persons With Severe Physical Disabilities.
      aug:
        au:
          Lau, Cynthia
          O'Leary, Stephanie
        affil: Pediatric Occupational Therapist, California Children Services, San Francisco, and Pediatric Rehabilitation and Recovery Unit, Mount Zion Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero, San Francisco, California
      sug:
        subj:
          Computer Input Devices Utilization
          Assistive Technology Devices Utilization
          Students with Disabilities
          Human
          Descriptive Research
          Comparative Studies
          Validity
          Perception
          Exertion
          Computers and Computerization
          Male
          Adolescence
          Adult
          Young Adult
          Spinal Cord Injuries
          Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Occupational Therapy
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Male
      ab: This research employed a descriptive case study design to compare subjects' performance using three computer input devices: the Tongue Touch Keypad, the Head-Master, and the mouthstick. The sample consisted of four students with severe physical disabilities enrolled in an adaptive computer class at a community college. Components of perfonnance examined were input speed, accuracy, and level of perceived exertion. Subjects' acceptance of each of the interface devices was also examined. Results showed input speed to be the fastest with the mouthstick, followed by the Head-Master and then the Tongue Touch Keypad. Accuracy of input did not van' significantly. Three subjects rated the Tongue Touch Keypad as requiring the lowest rate of perceived exertion, followed by the HeadMaster and then the mouthstick. Overall perfonnance did not necessarily affect subjects' acceptability ratings of the devices. Information from this study will assist therapists in evaluating the effectiveness and desirability of computer interface devices for patients.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        case study
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N