Parallel Object Activation and Attentional Gating of Information: Evidence From Eye Movements in the Multiple Object Naming Paradigm.
Do we access information from any object we can see, or do we access information only from objects that we intend to name? In 3 experiments using a modified multiple object naming paradigm, subjects were required to name several objects in succession when previews appeared briefly and simultaneously...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition Vol. 39; no. 2; pp. 365 - 375 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
American Psychological Association
Mar2013
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=86239593&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 86239593 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 02787393 EXL jtl: Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition issn: 02787393 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Mar2013 vid: 39 iid: 2 pid: 34 pub: American Psychological Association artinfo: ui: 86239593 10.1037/a0028646 ppf: 365 ppct: 10 formats: tig: atl: Parallel Object Activation and Attentional Gating of Information: Evidence From Eye Movements in the Multiple Object Naming Paradigm. aug: au: Schotter, Elizabeth R. Ferreira, Victor S. Rayner, Keith affil: Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego su: Attention Access to information Semantics Parallel processing Onomasiology Eye movements Data analysis sug: subj: Attention Access to information Semantics Parallel processing Onomasiology Eye movements Data analysis keyword: attention eye movements object naming parallel processing attention eye movements object naming parallel processing ab: Do we access information from any object we can see, or do we access information only from objects that we intend to name? In 3 experiments using a modified multiple object naming paradigm, subjects were required to name several objects in succession when previews appeared briefly and simultaneously in the same location as the target as well as at another location. In Experiment 1, preview benefit--faster processing of the target when the preview was related (a mirror image of the target) compared to unrelated (semantically and phonologically)--was found for the preview in the target location but not a location that was never to be named. In Experiment 2, preview benefit was found if a related preview appeared in either the target location or the third-to-be-named location. Experiment 3 showed the difference between results from the first 2 experiments was not due to the number of objects on the screen. These data suggest that attention serves to gate visual input about objects based on the intention to name them and that information from one intended-to-be-named object can facilitate processing of an object in another location. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|