PROTAGORO RELIATYVIZMAS: FRAGMENTŲ ANALIZĖ.
The article provides an analysis of Protagorean philosophy, concentrating on his famous homo mensura fragment. The examination is supported by significant philological clarifications, which eventually lead to the conclusion that ethico-political relativism does not follow from homo mensura fragment:...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 83; pp. 49 - 62 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2013
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=86260794&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 86260794 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2013 vid: 83 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 86260794 10.15388/Problemos.2013.0.834 ppf: 49 ppct: 13 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 674KB tig: atl: PROTAGORO RELIATYVIZMAS: FRAGMENTŲ ANALIZĖ. aug: au: Čelutka, Simas affil: Vilniaus universiteto Filosofijos, fakulteto Studentų mokslinė draugija, Universiteto g. 9/1, LT-01513 Vilnius su: Moral relativism Objectivity Refutation (Logic) Agnosticism Subjectivity Ethics sug: subj: Moral relativism Objectivity Refutation (Logic) Agnosticism Subjectivity Ethics keyword: man-measure objectivity perceptual relativism Protagoras subjective agnosticism žmogus-matas man-measure objectivity objektyvumas perceptual relativism perceptyvinis reliatyvizmas Protagoras subjective agnosticism subjektyvus agnosticizmas ab: The article provides an analysis of Protagorean philosophy, concentrating on his famous homo mensura fragment. The examination is supported by significant philological clarifications, which eventually lead to the conclusion that ethico-political relativism does not follow from homo mensura fragment: only perceptual relativism logically follows. The argument goes on to show that Protagorean perceptual relativism may be understood both objectively and subjectively. The Heraclitean and Parmenidean influences upon Protagoras' thought are also indicated. It is consequently shown how Plato and Aristotle misunderstood the central thesis of Protagoras, at the same time retrieving the homo mensura fragment from charges of self-refutation. It is also argued that Protagoras should not be called an "atheist", but only a "subjective agnostic". Darbe analizuojama Protagoro filosofijos visuma, ypatingą dėmesį kreipiantį garsųjį homo mensura fragmentą. Pastarąjį nagrinėjant pasitelkiami svarbūs filologiniai patikslinimai, kuriais remiantis daro¬ma išvada, jog iš homo mensura fragmento negalima išvesti etinio ar politinio reliatyvizmo: iš jo logiškai plaukia tik perceptyvinis reliatyvizmas. Taip pat parodoma, jog protagoriškąjį perceptyvinį reliatyvizmą galima suvokti tiek objektyvistiškai, tiek subjektyvistiškai. Darbe mėginama argumentuoti, jog Protago¬ro mąstymui didelę įtaką turėjo Hėrakleito ir Parmenido filosofijos. Nurodoma, kuriose vietose Platonas ir Aristotelis netiksliai suprato svarbiausią Protagoro ištarą, sykiu reabilituojant homo mensura fragmen¬tą nuo kaltinimų savęs paneigimu. Grindžiama mintis, jog Protagoras buvęs ne ateistas, o subjektyvus agnostikas. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: Lithuanian refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2013 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|