HEIDEGGERIS IR PLATONAS: TIESOS SAMPRATA.
This article interferes into the discussion regarding the relationship between the philosophies of Heidegger and Plato. It argues for the thesis that in the corpus of Platonic dialogues it is possible to find a concept of truth which corresponds to the Heideggerian one. First, it is shown, that both...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 83; pp. 62 - 73 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2013
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=86260795&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 86260795 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2013 vid: 83 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 86260795 10.15388/Problemos.2013.0.833 ppf: 62 ppct: 11 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 701KB tig: atl: HEIDEGGERIS IR PLATONAS: TIESOS SAMPRATA. aug: au: Mmickevičius, Tomas Nemunas affil: Vilniaus universiteto, Filosofijos istorijos ir logikos katedra, Universiteto g. 9/1, LT-01513 Vilnius su: Truth Argument Concepts Correspondence analysis (Communications) Possibility Secrecy sug: subj: Truth Argument Concepts Correspondence analysis (Communications) Possibility Secrecy keyword: conditions of possibility correctness correspondence truth unconcealedness atitikimas conditions of possibility correctness correspondence galimybės sąlygos nepaslėptis tiesa tiesingumas truth unconcealedness ab: This article interferes into the discussion regarding the relationship between the philosophies of Heidegger and Plato. It argues for the thesis that in the corpus of Platonic dialogues it is possible to find a concept of truth which corresponds to the Heideggerian one. First, it is shown, that both Plato and Heidegger similarly describe the genesis of false language and it's connectedness with un-truth. Secondly, it is shown that both Plato and Heidegger understand truth -- to use a Heideggerian concept -- as unconcealedness with concealedness belonging to it. And finally, it is shown that in the works of Plato one can find structural equivalents of later Heidegger's attempt to think over the "conditions of possibility" of truth as unconcealedness. Šiuo straipsniu įsiterpiama į diskusiją Heideggerio ir Platono filosofijų santykio nustatymo klausimu. Straipsnyje trimis pagrindiniais argumentais parodoma, kad Platono dialogų korpuse galima aptikti to¬kią tiesos sampratą, kuri atitinka heidegeriškąją. Parodoma, pirma, kad tiek Platonas, tiek Heideggeris panašiai aptarė klaidingos kalbos genezę bei tokios kalbos reikšmę ne-tiesai; antra, kad tiek Platonas, tiek Heideggeris tiesą supranta kaip -- Heideggerio terminu tariant -- nepaslėptį su jai priklausančia pa-slėptimi; ir, trečia, kad Platono tekstuose galima aptikti vėlyvojo Heideggerio apmąstomų tiesos kaip ne-paslėpties„galimybės sąlygų"struktūrinius atitikmenis. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: Lithuanian refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2013 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|