Working with Transcripts: An Abridged Review of Issues in Transcription.
This paper provides an abbreviated review of the theories and practices that are related to transcribing spoken discourse. The review identifies four keys areas of transcription, discusses why they are important to all investigations of spoken discourse analysis, and considers the practical implicat...
| Publicado en: | Language & Linguistics Compass Vol. 7; no. 4; pp. 251 - 262 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Apr2013
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=87106447&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 87106447 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 1749818X BDC7 jtl: Language & Linguistics Compass issn: 1749818X maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Apr2013 vid: 7 iid: 4 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 87106447 10.1111/lnc3.12023 ppf: 251 ppct: 11 formats: tig: atl: Working with Transcripts: An Abridged Review of Issues in Transcription. aug: au: Jenks, Christopher Joseph affil: City University of Hong Kong, Department of English, Kowloon Tong Hong Kong su: Discourse analysis Transcription (Linguistics) Language & languages Abbreviations Semantics sug: subj: Discourse analysis Transcription (Linguistics) Language & languages Abbreviations Semantics ab: This paper provides an abbreviated review of the theories and practices that are related to transcribing spoken discourse. The review identifies four keys areas of transcription, discusses why they are important to all investigations of spoken discourse analysis, and considers the practical implications of carrying out transcript-based research. The four areas of transcription discussed in this review are organized into the following sections: theoretical issues, representation, transcription software, and transcription ethics. The aim in providing this review is to argue that while there is no monolithic way of transcribing spoken discourse, the theories and practices that underpin and shape transcription work are highly complex, inherently problematic, and therefore should not be taken for granted. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 2013 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|