Energy Constraints.
Building on research in anthropology and philosophy, one can make a distinction between type I and type II energy ethics as a framework for advancing public debate about energy. Type I holds energy production and use as a fundamental good and is grounded in the assumption that increases in energy pr...
| Publicado en: | Science & Engineering Ethics Vol. 19; no. 2; pp. 313 - 320 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Jun2013
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=87734294&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 87734294 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13533452 GNI jtl: Science & Engineering Ethics issn: 13533452 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2013 vid: 19 iid: 2 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 87734294 10.1007/s11948-013-9446-3 ppf: 313 ppct: 7 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 153KB tig: atl: Energy Constraints. aug: au: Mitcham, Carl Rolston, Jessica affil: Liberal Arts and International Studies, Colorado School of Mines, Golden 80401 USA su: Anthropological research Philosophical research Energy consumption Happiness Profitability Well-being sug: subj: Anthropological research Philosophical research Energy consumption Happiness Profitability Well-being keyword: Anthropology of energy Energy Energy culture Energy ethics Ethics ab: Building on research in anthropology and philosophy, one can make a distinction between type I and type II energy ethics as a framework for advancing public debate about energy. Type I holds energy production and use as a fundamental good and is grounded in the assumption that increases in energy production and consumption result in increases in human wellbeing. Conversely, type II questions the linear relationship between energy production and progress by examining questions of equity and human happiness. The type I versus type II framework helps to advance public debates about energy that address broad questions of profitability, regulation, and the environment, and in the process poses fundamental questions about the reverence for energy growth in advanced technological societies. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Science & Engineering Ethics is a copyright of Springer, 2013. All Rights Reserved. item: Science & Engineering Ethics holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2013 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|