HISTORICAL ACTOR/AGENCY FROM A PRAXEOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE.

This paper attempts to scrutinize a concept of historical actor/agency from the epistemological perspective of praxeological theories as formulated by Pierre Bourdieu, Anthony Giddens and Andreas Reckwitz. These theories are examined as potentially fruitful starting-points for theoretical re-articul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:	Croatian Journal of Ethnology & Folklore Research / Narodna Umjetnost Vol. 48; no. 1; pp. 55 - 66
Autor principal:	BLAŽEVIĆ, ZRINKA
Formato:	Artículo
Publicado:	Institute of Ethnology & Folklore Research 2011
Materias:	Praxeology Act (Philosophy) Ethnohistory Anthropology methodology Theory of knowledge Consciousness
Acceso en línea:	Ver este registro en EBSCOhost

Descripción
Sumario:	This paper attempts to scrutinize a concept of historical actor/agency from the epistemological perspective of praxeological theories as formulated by Pierre Bourdieu, Anthony Giddens and Andreas Reckwitz. These theories are examined as potentially fruitful starting-points for theoretical re-articulation of the concept of historical actor/agency, mainly for their heuristic values and empirical research possibilities from the disciplinary perspective of historical anthropology. Moreover, the focus is put on detecting possible convergencies/divergencies of the praxeological notions of actor/agency with ity and dispositive analysis. In conclusion, this paper highlights indeterminacies, resistances and phenomena of ontological and phenomenological U članku nastojim istražiti koncept povijesnih aktera/djelovanja iz epistemološke perspektive prakseoloških teorija kako su ih formulirali Pierre Bourdieu, Anthonv Giddens i Andreas Reckwitz. Te su teorije ispitane kao potencijalno plodonosna ishodišta za teorijsku reartikulaciju koncepta povijesnih aktera/djelovanja poglavito zbog svoje heuristične vrijednosti i mogućnosti za empirijska istraživanja iz perspektive historijske antropologije. Povrh toga, naglasak je na otkrivanju potencijalnih konvergencija/divergencija prakseoloških koncepata aktera/djelovanja s "gramatološkom" antropologijom, teorijom presijecanja i analizom dispozitiva. Zaključno, članak upozorava na neodređenosti, otpore i "preostatke" djelovanja te (ne)mogućnost teoretiziranja o pojavama ontološke i fenomenološke diferancije.