Intuitionistic Logic and Elementary Rules.

The interplay of introduction and elimination rules for propositional connectives is often seen as suggesting a distinguished role for intuitionistic logic. We prove three formal results concerning intuitionistic propositional logic that bear on that perspective, and discuss their significance. Firs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Mind (0026-4423) Vol. 120; no. 480; pp. 1035 - 1052
Autores principales: Humberstone, Lloyd, Makinson, David
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Oct2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=88989101&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 88989101
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00264423
        MND
      jtl: Mind (0026-4423)
      issn: 00264423
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2011
      vid: 120
      iid: 480
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        88989101
        10.1093/mind/fzr076
      ppf: 1035
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 122KB
      tig:
        atl: Intuitionistic Logic and Elementary Rules.
      aug:
        au:
          Humberstone, Lloyd
          Makinson, David
        affil:
          Monash University lloyd.humberstone@monash.edu
          London School of Economics david.makinson@gmail.com
      su:
        Logic
        Philosophy
        Critical thinking
        Reasoning
        Intellect
      sug:
        subj:
          Logic
          Philosophy
          Critical thinking
          Reasoning
          Intellect
      ab: The interplay of introduction and elimination rules for propositional connectives is often seen as suggesting a distinguished role for intuitionistic logic. We prove three formal results concerning intuitionistic propositional logic that bear on that perspective, and discuss their significance. First, for a range of connectives including both negation and the falsum, there are no classically or intuitionistically correct introduction rules. Second, irrespective of the choice of negation or the falsum as a primitive connective, classical and intuitionistic consequence satisfy exactly the same structural, introduction, and elimination (briefly, elementary) rules. Third, for falsum as primitive only, intuitionistic consequence is the least consequence relation that satisfies all classically correct elementary rules.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: © 2019 Mind Association.
      item: Mind (0026-4423)
      holder: Oxford University Press / USA
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2011
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N