William Welwod's Treatises on Maritime Law.
William Welwod's The Sea-Law of Scotland (1590), An Abridgement of All Sea-Lawes (1613) and De dominio maris (1616) are widely known and equally widely understood to have grown out of each other, the 1616 treatise from a chapter of the 1613 treatise, and the 1613 treatise from the central chapters o...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Legal History Vol. 34; no. 2; pp. 172 - 211 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Aug2013
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=89431841&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 89431841 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 01440365 7JG jtl: Journal of Legal History issn: 01440365 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Aug2013 vid: 34 iid: 2 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 89431841 10.1080/01440365.2013.810380 ppf: 172 ppct: 39 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 219KB tig: atl: William Welwod's Treatises on Maritime Law. aug: au: Ford, J.D. affil: University of Aberdeen su: Maritime law Welwod, William International law Statutory interpretation Law of the sea sug: subj: Maritime law Welwod, William International law Statutory interpretation Law of the sea ab: William Welwod's The Sea-Law of Scotland (1590), An Abridgement of All Sea-Lawes (1613) and De dominio maris (1616) are widely known and equally widely understood to have grown out of each other, the 1616 treatise from a chapter of the 1613 treatise, and the 1613 treatise from the central chapters of the 1590 treatise. Less widely known – indeed, entirely neglected – is a fourth treatise, surviving in a single manuscript, which is clearly related to the three that were printed but in a way that casts doubt on the usual understanding of how they were related to each other. This article begins by examining the structure, style and sources of the four treatises, goes on to reconsider the relationship between them, and ends by identifying various contexts in which the treatises will need to be located if they are to be read in a historically sensitive manner. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Journal of Legal History is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Journal of Legal History holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd dt: @attributes: year: 2013 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|