Self-Plagiarism in Academic Publishing: The Anatomy of a Misnomer.
The paper discusses self-plagiarism and associated practices in scholarly publishing. It approaches at some length the conceptual issues raised by the notion of self-plagiarism. It distinguishes among and then examines the main families of arguments against self-plagiarism, as well as the question o...
| Publicado en: | Science & Engineering Ethics Vol. 19; no. 3; pp. 775 - 798 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Sep2013
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=89583470&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 89583470 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13533452 GNI jtl: Science & Engineering Ethics issn: 13533452 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Sep2013 vid: 19 iid: 3 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 89583470 10.1007/s11948-012-9416-1 ppf: 775 ppct: 23 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 259KB tig: atl: Self-Plagiarism in Academic Publishing: The Anatomy of a Misnomer. aug: au: Andreescu, Liviu affil: Spriu Haret University, Bucharest, Ion Ghica 13 Str. District 3, Bucharest Romania su: Scholarly publishing Plagiarism Generalization Ethics Families Authorship sug: subj: Scholarly publishing Plagiarism Generalization Ethics Families Authorship keyword: Academic ethics Academic publishing Copyright infringement Duplicate publication Informational noise Salami publication Self-plagiarism ab: The paper discusses self-plagiarism and associated practices in scholarly publishing. It approaches at some length the conceptual issues raised by the notion of self-plagiarism. It distinguishes among and then examines the main families of arguments against self-plagiarism, as well as the question of possibly legitimate reasons to engage in this practice. It concludes that some of the animus frequently reserved for self-plagiarism may be the result of, among others, poor choice of a label, unwarranted generalizations as to its ill effects based on the specific experience (and goals) of particular disciplines, and widespread but not necessarily beneficial publishing practices. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Science & Engineering Ethics is a copyright of Springer, 2013. All Rights Reserved. item: Science & Engineering Ethics holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2013 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|