manifestos error? Falsches Zitieren und literarische Kommunikation (zu Gel. 15.6).
This paper examines a statement of Aulus Gellius about a misleading attribution in Cicero's De gloria to explore the conditions and possibilities of misquotation in an ancient text. To do this, it draws on the conversational maxims of Paul Grice and analyzes the modern solutions presented for the pa...
| Publicado en: | Mnemosyne Vol. 66; no. 3; pp. 411 - 433 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Brill Academic Publishers
2013
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=89636693&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 89636693 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00267074 MNM jtl: Mnemosyne issn: 00267074 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: 2013 vid: 66 iid: 3 pid: 639 pub: Brill Academic Publishers artinfo: ui: 89636693 10.1163/156852512X617579 ppf: 411 ppct: 22 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.1MB tig: atl: manifestos error? Falsches Zitieren und literarische Kommunikation (zu Gel. 15.6). aug: au: Tischer, Ute affil: Universität Potsdam, Klassische Philologie, Am Neuen Palais ;o, 1446g Potsdam, Germany su: Gellius, Aulus Cicero, Marcus Tullius, 106 B.C.-43 B.C. Maxims Essays Latin literature -- History & criticism sug: subj: Gellius, Aulus Cicero, Marcus Tullius, 106 B.C.-43 B.C. Maxims Essays Latin literature -- History & criticism keyword: Aulus Gellius conversational maxims intentionality M. Tullius Cicero misquotation ab: This paper examines a statement of Aulus Gellius about a misleading attribution in Cicero's De gloria to explore the conditions and possibilities of misquotation in an ancient text. To do this, it draws on the conversational maxims of Paul Grice and analyzes the modern solutions presented for the passage as well as the opinions Gellius implicitly expresses. Its thesis is that the interpretation of misquotations, both ancient and modern, follows similar principles and is determined by assumptions of intention made by the interpreter. It will be argued that Gellius' way of presenting the misquotation is a rhetorical strategy to provoke critical consideration of quotations by the recipient. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: German refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Mnemosyne is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Mnemosyne holder: Brill Academic Publishers dt: @attributes: year: 2013 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|