CYBERSURVEILLANCE WITHOUT RESTRAINT? THE MEANING AND SOCIAL VALUE OF THE PROBABLE CAUSE AND REASONABLE SUSPICION STANDARDS IN GOVERNMENTAL ACCESS TO THIRD-PARTY ELECTRONIC RECORDS.

The United States Supreme Court has interpreted the Fourth Amendment to provide no privacy protection for records held by third parties. The American Bar Association recently sought to step into this breach by recommending standards to govern government access to third- party electronic records, suc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology Vol. 103; no. 3; pp. 839 - 906
Autor principal: TASLITZ, ANDREW E.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Northwestern University Summer2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=89862801&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 89862801
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00914169
        CLC
      jtl: Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology
      issn: 00914169
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Summer2013
      vid: 103
      iid: 3
      pid: 1093
      pub: Northwestern University
    artinfo:
      ui: 89862801
      ppf: 839
      ppct: 67
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 6.7MB
      tig:
        atl: CYBERSURVEILLANCE WITHOUT RESTRAINT? THE MEANING AND SOCIAL VALUE OF THE PROBABLE CAUSE AND REASONABLE SUSPICION STANDARDS IN GOVERNMENTAL ACCESS TO THIRD-PARTY ELECTRONIC RECORDS.
      aug:
        au: TASLITZ, ANDREW E.
        affil: Professor of Law, Washington College of Law, American University
      su:
        United States
        United States. Supreme Court
        United States. Constitution. 4th Amendment
        American Bar Association
        Right of privacy
        Law
        Electronic record laws
        Probable cause (Searches & seizures)
        Records & correspondence of the banking industry
        Internet service provider laws
      sug:
        subj:
          Right of privacy
          Law
          United States
          United States. Supreme Court
          United States. Constitution. 4th Amendment
          American Bar Association
          Wired Telecommunications Carriers
          All Other Telecommunications
          Other telecommunications
          Electronic record laws
          Probable cause (Searches & seizures)
          Records & correspondence of the banking industry
          Internet service provider laws
      ab: The United States Supreme Court has interpreted the Fourth Amendment to provide no privacy protection for records held by third parties. The American Bar Association recently sought to step into this breach by recommending standards to govern government access to third- party electronic records, such as those held by banks, Internet service providers, and medical care providers. Those standards retain requirements of probable cause and reasonable suspicion for government access respectively to highly protected and moderately protected records. Law enforcement has challenged these requirements as unduly burdensome, while some commentators have argued that probable cause and reasonable suspicion are so easy to prove in the third-party records context as to provide no effective privacy protection at all. This Article challenges both those views by defining with greater specificity than has yet been accomplished the meaning of two aspects of probable cause: the quantitative and the qualitative. The Article also addresses their social value by exploring cognitive science, philosophy on the nature of probability, and political incentives facing police and prosecutors. The Article also examines the evidentiary concept of "weight" and analyzes the implications of various technological processes for applying these justification requirements in the third-party electronic-records context. The Article ultimately concludes that retaining probable cause and reasonable suspicion protections--when coupled with additional protections provided by the standards--is neither oppressive of law enforcement nor underprotective of persons whose records are searched. Instead, the balance achieved by the standards in this area is just right.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N