PRIVACY VERSUS SECURITY.
Legal scholarship tends to conflate privacy and security. However, security and privacy can, and should, be treated as distinct concerns. Privacy discourse involves difficult normative decisions about competing claims to legitimate access to, use of, and alteration of information. It is about select...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology Vol. 103; no. 3; pp. 667 - 684 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Northwestern University
Summer2013
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=89862805&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 89862805 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00914169 CLC jtl: Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology issn: 00914169 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Summer2013 vid: 103 iid: 3 pid: 1093 pub: Northwestern University artinfo: ui: 89862805 ppf: 667 ppct: 17 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.7MB tig: atl: PRIVACY VERSUS SECURITY. aug: au: BAMBAUER, DEREK E. affil: Associate Professor of Law, University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law su: United States Acxiom Corp. Right of privacy Consumers Law Personally identifiable information Legal education Data mining Disclosure laws Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act Legal status of consumers Security systems sug: subj: Right of privacy Consumers Law United States Acxiom Corp. Security Systems Services (except Locksmiths) Personally identifiable information Legal education Data mining Disclosure laws Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act Legal status of consumers Security systems ab: Legal scholarship tends to conflate privacy and security. However, security and privacy can, and should, be treated as distinct concerns. Privacy discourse involves difficult normative decisions about competing claims to legitimate access to, use of, and alteration of information. It is about selecting among different philosophies and choosing how various rights and entitlements ought to be ordered. Security implements those choices--it mediates between information and privacy selections. This Article argues that separating privacy from security has important practical consequences. Security failings should be penalized more readily and more heavily than privacy ones, both because there are no competing moral claims to resolve and because security flaws make all parties worse off. Currently, security flaws are penalized too rarely, and privacy ones too readily. The Article closes with a set of policy questions highlighted by the privacy-versus-security distinction that deserve further research. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|