Strange Parts: The Metaphysics of Non-classical Mereologies.

The dominant theory of parts and wholes - classical extensional mereology - has faced a number of challenges in the recent literature. This article gives a sampling of some of the alleged counterexamples to some of the more controversial principles involving the connections between parthood and iden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophy Compass Vol. 8; no. 9; pp. 834 - 846
Autor principal: Cotnoir, A. J.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=90210807&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 90210807
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        17479991
        1WQN
      jtl: Philosophy Compass
      issn: 17479991
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2013
      vid: 8
      iid: 9
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        90210807
        10.1111/phc3.12061
      ppf: 834
      ppct: 12
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Strange Parts: The Metaphysics of Non-classical Mereologies.
      aug:
        au: Cotnoir, A. J.
        affil: University of St Andrews
      su:
        Literature
        Whole & parts (Philosophy)
        Sampling (Process)
        Axioms
        Blame
      sug:
        subj:
          Literature
          Whole & parts (Philosophy)
          Sampling (Process)
          Axioms
          Blame
      ab: The dominant theory of parts and wholes - classical extensional mereology - has faced a number of challenges in the recent literature. This article gives a sampling of some of the alleged counterexamples to some of the more controversial principles involving the connections between parthood and identity. Along the way, some of the main revisionary approaches are reviewed. First, counterexamples to extensionality are reviewed. The 'supplementation' axioms that generate extensionality are examined more carefully, and a suggested revision is considered. Second, the paper considers an alternative approach that focuses the blame on antisymmetry but allows us to keep natural supplementation axioms. Third, we look at counterexamples to the idempotency of composition and the associated 'parts just once' principle. We explore options for developing weaker mereologies that avoid such commitments.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2013
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N