Planning for procurement: challenges facing CCGs.

Clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) have inherited contracts and service-level agreements from their pre-existing primary care trusts. They are expected to effect improved services, outcomes and value for money, together with significant cash savings, through the process of procurement and re-procu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:British Journal of Healthcare Management Vol. 19; no. 10; pp. 482 - 488
Autores principales: Gandy, Rob, Case-Upton, Peter
Formato: tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Mark Allen Holdings Limited Oct2013
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=91268898&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 91268898
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13580574
        GHB
      jtl: British Journal of Healthcare Management
      issn: 13580574
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2013
      vid: 19
      iid: 10
      pid: 11383
      pub: Mark Allen Holdings Limited
    artinfo:
      ui:
        91268898
        104146596
        104146596
        10.12968/bjhc.2013.19.10.482
        91268898
      ppf: 482
      ppct: 6
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Planning for procurement: challenges facing CCGs.
      aug:
        au:
          Gandy, Rob
          Case-Upton, Peter
        affil: NHS Healthcare Consultant and Visiting Professor, Liverpool Business School, Liverpool John Moores University
      sug:
        subj:
          National Health Programs England
          Contract Services Standards
          Planning Techniques
          Health Services Needs and Demand
          England
          Collaboration
          Health Services Standards
          Cost Savings
          Organizational Restructuring
          Quality Management, Organizational
      ab: Clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) have inherited contracts and service-level agreements from their pre-existing primary care trusts. They are expected to effect improved services, outcomes and value for money, together with significant cash savings, through the process of procurement and re-procurement. For many services this is the only means of making savings and once a contract is awarded it cannot be amended (beyond set parameters) until it is renewed, thereby limiting CCGs' room for manoeuvre. This article describes key issues and challenges facing CCGs in developing their approach to procurement and sets out how they might usefully be addressed. They include: assuring the quality of service specifications; staggering contract end dates; designing procurement plans to make best use of key commissioning skills and resources; and timing independent evaluations of contract performance and delivery. Decisions about how CCGs can and should work together are of critical importance given the resulting implications, particularly with regard to balancing cost-efficiency with plurality.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N