Objectivism and Prospectivism About Rightness.

The article offers the author's insights on the proponents of objectivism and prospectivism about rightness. The author argues that prospectivism is the proper account of moral rightness. He notes that the conversation of objective rightness can be easily interchanged with the conversation of bestne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy Vol. 7; no. 2; pp. 1 - 22
Autor principal: Mason, Elinor
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=91687119&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 91687119
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15593061
        8WVW
      jtl: Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy
      issn: 15593061
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2013
      vid: 7
      iid: 2
      pid: 53692
      pub: Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy
    artinfo:
      ui: 91687119
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 21
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 303KB
      tig:
        atl: Objectivism and Prospectivism About Rightness.
      aug:
        au: Mason, Elinor
        affil: University of Edinburgh, Department of Philosophy
      su:
        Social ethics
        Right & wrong
        Social responsibility
        Integrity
        Human error
      sug:
        subj:
          Social ethics
          Right & wrong
          Social responsibility
          Integrity
          Human error
      ab: The article offers the author's insights on the proponents of objectivism and prospectivism about rightness. The author argues that prospectivism is the proper account of moral rightness. He notes that the conversation of objective rightness can be easily interchanged with the conversation of bestness. He also mentions that the appropriate thing to do depends with uncertainty and bestness does not means there is always rightness.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy is the property of Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy
      holder: Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2013
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N