E. LEVINAS IR ETINĖS FILOSOFIJOS ĮTEISINIMAS - ATSAKYMAS A. MICKŪNUI.

This article presents counter-arguments to Algis Mickūnas's critique of Emmanuel Levinas's ethical philosophy, delving into the question whether thinking based on radical exteriority can remain philosophy. First, Mickūnas argues that there is an erroneous speculation in Levinas's phenomenology which...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Problems / Problemos Vol. 84; pp. 123 - 138
Autor principal: Saldukaitytė, Jolanta
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Vilnius University 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=91749384&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 91749384
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13921126
        3D4C
      jtl: Problems / Problemos
      issn: 13921126
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2013
      vid: 84
      pid: 16037
      pub: Vilnius University
    artinfo:
      ui:
        91749384
        10.15388/Problemos.2013.0.1773
      ppf: 123
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1MB
      tig:
        atl: E. LEVINAS IR ETINĖS FILOSOFIJOS ĮTEISINIMAS - ATSAKYMAS A. MICKŪNUI.
      aug:
        au: Saldukaitytė, Jolanta
        affil: Mykolo Romerio universiteto, Humanitarinių mokslų instituto, Filosofijos katedra, Ateities g. 20, LT-08303 Vilnius
      su:
        Lévinas, Emmanuel, 1906-1995
        Legitimation of children (Germanic law)
        Ethics
        Phenomenology
        Teleology
        Metaphysics
        Philosophical research
      sug:
        subj:
          Lévinas, Emmanuel, 1906-1995
          Legitimation of children (Germanic law)
          Ethics
          Phenomenology
          Teleology
          Metaphysics
          Philosophical research
      keyword:
        ethics
        metaphysics
        phenomenology
        ethics
        etika
        fenomenologija
        Levinas
        metafizika
        metaphysics
        Mickūnas
        phenomenology
      ab:
        This article presents counter-arguments to Algis Mickūnas's critique of Emmanuel Levinas's ethical philosophy, delving into the question whether thinking based on radical exteriority can remain philosophy. First, Mickūnas argues that there is an erroneous speculation in Levinas's phenomenology which leads out of philosophy into theology. Second, he argues that the ethical relation, central to Levinas's thought, is but another ontological discourse of power. The present article shows that Mickūnas's criticism comes from his concept of philosophy which is free from transcendence as well as Western metaphysics. The author argues that the specific notion of transcendence in Levinas is not the same as is found in speculative theology, which is concerned with God, but is rather the one required by the pursuit of phenomenologieal research of inter-subjectivity to its limits. The author also argues that the ethical metaphysics defended by Levinas is not the discourse of power nor does it reject Western philosophy. Rather, by recognizing the full significance of inter-subjectivity deeper ethical dimension of meaning is revealed, and hence Western philosophy is deepend and Levinas kept within the bounds of philosophy.
        Straipsnyje aptariama Algio Mickūno kritika Emmanuelio Levino etinės filosofijos atžvilgiu, klausiant, ar radikalia išorybe paremtas mąstymas gali būti laikomas filosofija. Viena vertus, Mickūnas Levino fenomenologijoje įžvelgia spekuliatyvumo momentą, nuo filosofijos vedantį link teologijos. Antra, jis tvirtina, kad etinis santykis, esminis Levino mąstyme, galiausiai yra dar vienas ontologinis galios diskursas. Ši Mickūno kritika seka iš jo filosofijos sampratos, kuri atpalaiduojama tiek nuo transcendencijos mąstymo, tiek nuo Vakarų metafizikos apskritai. Laikomasi nuomonės, kad Levino filosofijoje transcendencija nėra tapati spekuliatyviosios teologijos Dievo sampratai. Teigiama, kad Levino filosofijoje ji nurodo į intersubjektyvų santykį, reikalaujantį fenomenologinės prieigos. Autorė gina požiūrį, kad Levino etinė metafizika nėra grindžiama galios santykiu, nėra ji ir Vakarų filosofijos atmetimas. Pripažįstant intersubjektyvumo svarbą, Levino filosofijoje veikiau atskleidžiamas gilesnis, etinis, metafizikos prasmės matmuo, taip drauge pagilinant pačią Vakarų filosofiją.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: Lithuanian
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Problems / Problemos
      holder: Vilnius University
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2013
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N