Are There Any Limits? -- On Moral Limits.
The debates on objectness, space-constitution, and the totalizing affects of works of art and design, once triggered by minimalism with its pronounced focus on pure objectness and the medium as the message, have mainly taken place in "marginal" or interdisciplinary fields, such as ethics in design a...
| Publicado en: | International Journal of the Humanities Vol. 9; no. 10; pp. 293 - 304 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Common Ground Research Networks
2012
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=91798257&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 91798257 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 15IH jtl: International Journal of the Humanities maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2012 vid: 9 iid: 10 pid: 22359 pub: Common Ground Research Networks artinfo: ui: 91798257 10.18848/1447-9508/cgp/v09i10/43346 ppf: 293 ppct: 11 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 357KB tig: atl: Are There Any Limits? -- On Moral Limits. aug: au: Soldan, Angelika Rodriguez, Miriam T. affil: UT Brownsville, Texas, USA su: Ethics research Totalizing Minimalism (Literature) Interdisciplinary research Aestheticism (Literature) Theory of knowledge Responsibility sug: subj: Ethics research Totalizing Minimalism (Literature) Interdisciplinary research Aestheticism (Literature) Theory of knowledge Responsibility keyword: Aesthetics Ethics Value-setting ab: The debates on objectness, space-constitution, and the totalizing affects of works of art and design, once triggered by minimalism with its pronounced focus on pure objectness and the medium as the message, have mainly taken place in "marginal" or interdisciplinary fields, such as ethics in design and architecture, literary criticism, psychoanalysis, and art, gender, cultural, and media theory. In contrast to aesthetics, which has come to challenge its own raison d'être, the controversies on post-(art) theory, post-aesthetics, anti-aesthetics, new-aestheticism, and academic ethics, seem to be less forceful in taking on the challenge of a reified and totalizing world staring back at man, despite the adoption of new approaches, such as linguistic, anthropological, and psychoanalytic, epistemological, and performativity. This paper will address questions, such as what transcends and disrupts these totalizing effects? Are there any moral limits to what could be created or to what one should be exposed to, or are these questions themselves liminal, because they presume a particular point of measurement, that is, a historical Mass? Moreover, links to subjectivity and identity construction will be shown. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of International Journal of the Humanities is the property of Common Ground Research Networks and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: International Journal of the Humanities holder: Common Ground Research Networks dt: @attributes: year: 2012 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|