We Can Have It All: Improved Surveillance Outcomes and Decreased Personnel Costs Associated With Electronic Reportable Disease Surveillance, North Carolina, 2010.

Objectives. We assessed the timeliness, accuracy, and cost of a new electronic disease surveillance system at the local health department level. We describe practices associated with lower cost and better surveillance timeliness and accuracy. Methods. Interviews conducted May through August 2010 wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Journal of Public Health Vol. 103; no. 12; pp. 2292 - 2298
Autores principales: Samoff, Erika, DiBiase, Lauren, Fangman, Mary T., Fleischauer, Aaron T., Waller, Anna E., MacDonald, Pia D. M.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Public Health Association Dec2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=91821060&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 91821060
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00900036
        APH
      jtl: American Journal of Public Health
      issn: 00900036
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2013
      vid: 103
      iid: 12
      pid: 44
      pub: American Public Health Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        91821060
        10.2105/AJPH.2013.301353
      ppf: 2292
      ppct: 6
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: We Can Have It All: Improved Surveillance Outcomes and Decreased Personnel Costs Associated With Electronic Reportable Disease Surveillance, North Carolina, 2010.
      aug:
        au:
          Samoff, Erika
          DiBiase, Lauren
          Fangman, Mary T.
          Fleischauer, Aaron T.
          Waller, Anna E.
          MacDonald, Pia D. M.
        affil:
          Institute for Public Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
          Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and North Carolina Division of Public Health, Raleigh
          Carolina Center for Health Informatics, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
      su:
        North Carolina
        Public health surveillance
        Interviewing
        Local government
        Organizational effectiveness
        Comparative studies
        Confidence intervals
        Cost control
        Database evaluation
        Electronic data interchange
        Management information systems
        Research methodology
        Public health administration
        Public health laws
        Quality assurance
        Research funding
        Statistical sampling
        Time
        Control groups
        Descriptive statistics
      sug:
        subj:
          Public health surveillance
          Interviewing
          Local government
          Organizational effectiveness
          North Carolina
          Administration of Public Health Programs
          Marketing Research and Public Opinion Polling
          Comparative studies
          Confidence intervals
          Cost control
          Database evaluation
          Electronic data interchange
          Management information systems
          Research methodology
          Public health administration
          Public health laws
          Quality assurance
          Research funding
          Statistical sampling
          Time
          Control groups
          Descriptive statistics
      ab: Objectives. We assessed the timeliness, accuracy, and cost of a new electronic disease surveillance system at the local health department level. We describe practices associated with lower cost and better surveillance timeliness and accuracy. Methods. Interviews conducted May through August 2010 with local health department (LHD) staff at a simple random sample of 30 of 100 North Carolina counties provided information on surveillance practices and costs; we used surveillance system data to calculate timeliness and accuracy. We identified LHDs with best timeliness and accuracy and used these categories to compare surveillance practices and costs. Results. Local health departments in the top tertiles for surveillance timeliness and accuracy had a lower cost per case reported than LHDs with lower timeliness and accuracy ($71 and $124 per case reported, respectively; P = .03). Best surveillance practices fell into 2 domains: efficient use of the electronic surveillance system and use of surveillance data for local evaluation and program management. Conclusions. Timely and accurate surveillance can be achieved in the setting of restricted funding experienced by many LHDs. Adopting best surveillance practices may improve both efficiency and public health outcomes.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N