Empirical evidence claims are a priori.

This paper responds to Achinstein’s criticism of the thesis that the only empirical fact that can affect the truth of an objective evidence claim such as ‘ is evidence for ’ (or ‘ confirms to degree ’) is the truth of . It shows that cases involving evidential flaws, which form the basis for Achins...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 190; no. 13; pp. 2821 - 2835
Autor principal: Rowbottom, Darrell P.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Sep2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost