Hate speech, free speech, and the unspoken.
Examines both sides of the debate on First Amendment rights to free expression as it applies to `hate speech'. Spoken epithets, et al; The rise in bias-related incidents; The impact of offensive language; The fifty-year-old precedent in which theSupreme Court allowed states to regulate what it call...
| Publicado en: | Tikkun (Duke University Press) Vol. 7; no. 3; pp. 53 - 57 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Duke University Press
May92
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| Sumario: | Examines both sides of the debate on First Amendment rights to free expression as it applies to `hate speech'. Spoken epithets, et al; The rise in bias-related incidents; The impact of offensive language; The fifty-year-old precedent in which theSupreme Court allowed states to regulate what it called `fighting words'; The rule of civil libertarians in trying to get the Court to rescind the `fighting words' concept. |
|---|