Punctuated Equilibrium and the Supreme Court.

In the legislative and executive branches, policy scholars have used punctuated equilibrium ( PE) theory to describe and explain patterns of change. However, there has been little examination of how PE might apply to courts and legal policy change. This article addresses that gap by providing eviden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Policy Studies Journal Vol. 41; no. 4; pp. 655 - 683
Autor principal: Robinson, Rob
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Nov2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=92662490&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 92662490
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0190292X
        PSJ
      jtl: Policy Studies Journal
      issn: 0190292X
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2013
      vid: 41
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        92662490
        10.1111/psj.12036
      ppf: 655
      ppct: 28
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 659KB
      tig:
        atl: Punctuated Equilibrium and the Supreme Court.
      aug:
        au: Robinson, Rob
      su:
        United States. Supreme Court
        United States. Constitution
        Punctuated equilibrium (Social science)
        Information processing
        American law
        United States appellate courts
        Legal precedent
        Stare decisis
      sug:
        subj:
          Punctuated equilibrium (Social science)
          Information processing
          United States. Supreme Court
          United States. Constitution
          American law
          United States appellate courts
          Legal precedent
          Stare decisis
      ab: In the legislative and executive branches, policy scholars have used punctuated equilibrium ( PE) theory to describe and explain patterns of change. However, there has been little examination of how PE might apply to courts and legal policy change. This article addresses that gap by providing evidence that legal policy change-here conceptualized as changes in what precedents the Supreme Court most often cites-is governed by PE theory. After making a prima facie case for the applicability of PE theory to the Court, I leverage network rankings of Supreme Court decisions to create a proxy for legal policy change that improves on existing measures. Using both a stochastic process model and an analysis of the punctuations the measure uncovers, I find strong evidence of PE processes.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N