DOGS, HISTORY, AND AGENCY[This is a ].

Drawing on posthumanist theories from geography, anthropology, and science and technology studies (STS), this article argues that agency is shared unevenly between humans and nonhumans. It proposes that conceptualizing animals as agents allows them to enter history as active beings rather than stati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:History & Theory Vol. 52; no. 4; pp. 128 - 146
Autor principal: PEARSON, CHRIS
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Dec2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=92765125&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 92765125
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00182656
        HAT
      jtl: History & Theory
      issn: 00182656
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2013
      vid: 52
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        92765125
        10.1111/hith.10683
      ppf: 128
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 426KB
      tig:
        atl: DOGS, HISTORY, AND AGENCY[This is a ].
      aug:
        au: PEARSON, CHRIS
        affil: University of Liverpool
      su:
        Agent (Philosophy)
        Posthumanism
        Animals
        Animal psychology
        Dogs
        Working animals
        World War I
        History
      sug:
        subj:
          Agent (Philosophy)
          Posthumanism
          Animals
          Animal psychology
          Dogs
          Working animals
          World War I
          History
      keyword:
        canine psychology
        dogs
        intentionality
        nonhuman agency
      ab: Drawing on posthumanist theories from geography, anthropology, and science and technology studies (STS), this article argues that agency is shared unevenly between humans and nonhumans. It proposes that conceptualizing animals as agents allows them to enter history as active beings rather than static objects. Agency has become a key concept within history, especially since the rise of the 'new' social history. But many historians treat agency as a uniquely human attribute, arguing that animals lack the cognitive abilities, self-awareness, and intentionality to be agents. This article argues that human levels of intentionality are not a precondition of agency. Furthermore, it draws on research into canine psychology to propose that dogs display some degree of intentionality and self-directed action. The aim is not to turn dogs, or any other animals, into human-style agents nor to suggest that they display the same levels of skill, intentionality, and intelligence as humans. Instead, the objective is to show how dogs are purposeful and capable agents in their own way and to explore how they interact with human agents. The article particularly considers the agency of militarized dogs, especially those on the Western Front (1914-1918), to suggest how historians can use primary sources to uncover how individuals in the past have treated dogs as capable creatures and to capture some sense of dogs' embodied and purposeful agency.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of History & Theory is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: History & Theory
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2013
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N