XVI-Relativity, the Open Future, and the Passage of Time.

Is the objective passage of time compatible with relativistic physics? There are two easy routes to an affirmative answer: (1) provide a deflationary analysis of passage compatible with the block universe, or (2) argue that a privileged global present is compatible with relativity. (1) does not take...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Paperback) Vol. 113; no. 3pt3; pp. 321 - 364
Main Author: Pooley, Oliver
Format: Article
Published: Oxford University Press / USA Oct2013
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=93373138&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 93373138
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00667374
        D8Q
      jtl: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Paperback)
      issn: 00667374
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2013
      vid: 113
      iid: 3pt3
      pid: 10398
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        93373138
        10.1111/j.1467-9264.2013.00357.x
      ppf: 321
      ppct: 43
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: XVI-Relativity, the Open Future, and the Passage of Time.
      aug:
        au: Pooley, Oliver
        affil: Oriel College Oriel Square, University of Oxford
      su:
        Metaphysics
        Relativity (Physics)
        Spacetime
        Deflationary theory of truth
        Reasoning
      sug:
        subj:
          Metaphysics
          Relativity (Physics)
          Spacetime
          Deflationary theory of truth
          Reasoning
      ab: Is the objective passage of time compatible with relativistic physics? There are two easy routes to an affirmative answer: (1) provide a deflationary analysis of passage compatible with the block universe, or (2) argue that a privileged global present is compatible with relativity. (1) does not take passage seriously. (2) does not take relativity seriously. This paper is concerned with the viability of views that seek to take both passage and relativity seriously. The investigation proceeds by considering how traditional A-theoretic conceptions of passage might be generalized to relativistic space-times without incorporating a privileged global present. I argue that the most promising position marries the idea that open possibilities for the future are settled as time passes with a 'non-standard' interpretation of the relevant formal models.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2013
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N