Social praxis, party, and class relations today.
Today's political sociologists are once again interested in the study of the crisis of mass-based parties, anti-politics and anti-parliamentarism, crisis in the authority of the political class, prevailing corporate interests within republican institutions, and populism. Political sociology however,...
| Publicado en: | Academicus no. 9; pp. 172 - 200 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Academicus
2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=93580772&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 93580772 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 20793715 BK4T jtl: Academicus issn: 20793715 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2014 iid: 9 pid: 68858 pub: Academicus artinfo: ui: 93580772 10.7336/academicus.2014.09.12 ppf: 172 ppct: 28 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 737KB tig: atl: Social praxis, party, and class relations today. aug: au: Malo, Egni affil: London Metropolitan University, London, UK su: Praxis (Process) Social classes Political sociology Marxist philosophy Constitutionalism sug: subj: Praxis (Process) Social classes Political sociology Marxist philosophy Constitutionalism keyword: Class Collective Action Machiavelli Marxism Party Praxis Revolutionary Social Reformation State ab: Today's political sociologists are once again interested in the study of the crisis of mass-based parties, anti-politics and anti-parliamentarism, crisis in the authority of the political class, prevailing corporate interests within republican institutions, and populism. Political sociology however, takes the party, as a construct of political sociology alone, without consideration upon its militancy and action, as the party, which objectifies the foundation of a State, and as a result the party becomes, simply an historical category.1 We approach the problem of the modern state from many angles; analysing the nature of a political party as such; the ideological dangers of determinism and spontaneism which a party necessarily must struggle with; the type of non-administrative internal regime which is necessary for a party to be effective and so on.2 The problem we seek to elaborate is the specific character of the collective action that makes possible the passage from a sectored, corporate and subordinate role of purely negative opposition, to a leading role of conscious action towards not merely a partial adjustment within the system, but posing the issue of the State in its entirety. In developing this theme - as a study of the real relations between the political party, the classes and the State - a two-fold consideration is devoted to the study of Machiavelli and Marx: first from the angle of the real relations between the two, as thinkers of revolutionary politics, of action; and secondly from a perspective which would derive from the Marxist doctrines an articulated system of contemporary politics, as found in The Prince. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Academicus is the property of Academicus and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Academicus holder: Academicus dt: @attributes: year: 2014 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|