When We Do (and Do Not) Have a Classical Arrow of Time.

I point out that some common folk wisdom about time reversal invariance in classical mechanics is strictly incorrect, by showing some explicit examples in which classical time reversal invariance fails, even among conservative systems. I then show that there is nevertheless a broad class of familiar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Philosophy of Science Vol. 80; no. 5; pp. 1112 - 1125
Main Author: Roberts, Bryan W.
Format: Article
Published: Cambridge University Press Dec2013
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=93642208&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 93642208
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318248
        PSC
      jtl: Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00318248
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2013
      vid: 80
      iid: 5
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        93642208
        10.1086/674001
      ppf: 1112
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 187KB
      tig:
        atl: When We Do (and Do Not) Have a Classical Arrow of Time.
      aug:
        au: Roberts, Bryan W.
      su:
        Time reversal
        Quantum theory
        Spacetime
        Nuclear physics
        Quantum mechanics
        Physical laws
      sug:
        subj:
          Time reversal
          Quantum theory
          Spacetime
          Nuclear physics
          Quantum mechanics
          Physical laws
      ab: I point out that some common folk wisdom about time reversal invariance in classical mechanics is strictly incorrect, by showing some explicit examples in which classical time reversal invariance fails, even among conservative systems. I then show that there is nevertheless a broad class of familiar classical systems that are time reversal invariant.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy of Science
      holder: Cambridge University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2013
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N