Evaluating distributed cognition.

Human beings are promiscuously social creatures, and contemporary epistemologists are increasingly becoming aware that this shapes the ways in which humans process information. This awareness has tended to restrict itself, however, to testimony amongst isolated dyads. As scientific practice ably ill...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 191; no. 1; pp. 79 - 96
Autor principal: Green, Adam
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jan2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=94095467&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 94095467
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2014
      vid: 191
      iid: 1
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        94095467
        10.1007/s11229-013-0305-1
      ppf: 79
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 195KB
      tig:
        atl: Evaluating distributed cognition.
      aug:
        au: Green, Adam
        affil: University of Innsbruck, Sankt Nikolaus Gasse 27 6020 Innsbruck Austria
      su:
        Distributed cognition
        Human beings
        Human information processing
        Testimony (Theory of knowledge)
        Epistemics
        Virtue epistemology
      sug:
        subj:
          Distributed cognition
          Human beings
          Human information processing
          Testimony (Theory of knowledge)
          Epistemics
          Virtue epistemology
      keyword: Extended reliabilism
      ab: Human beings are promiscuously social creatures, and contemporary epistemologists are increasingly becoming aware that this shapes the ways in which humans process information. This awareness has tended to restrict itself, however, to testimony amongst isolated dyads. As scientific practice ably illustrates, information-processing can be spread over a vast social network. In this essay, a credit theory of knowledge is adapted to account for the normative features of strongly distributed cognition. A typical credit theory analyzes knowledge as an instance of obtaining success because of or through the ability of the individual knower. The extended credit theory developed here broadens this framework so as to accommodate team-like epistemic achievements. The extended credit theory is then contrasted with some similar proposals given from within a process reliabilist framework. Once one isolates pairs of cases of distributed cognition in which there is a difference between sheer reliability and reliability grounded in ability, one can see that the extended credit theory maps the normative terrain better than the alternatives.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2014. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2014
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N