Modelling the truth of scientific beliefs with cultural evolutionary theory.

Evolutionary anthropologists and archaeologists have been considerably successful in modelling the cumulative evolution of culture, of technological skills and knowledge in particular. Recently, one of these models has been introduced in the philosophy of science by De Cruz and De Smedt (Philos Stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 191; no. 1; pp. 109 - 126
Autores principales: Vaesen, Krist, Houkes, Wybo
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jan2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=94095468&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 94095468
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2014
      vid: 191
      iid: 1
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        94095468
        10.1007/s11229-013-0257-5
      ppf: 109
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 328KB
      tig:
        atl: Modelling the truth of scientific beliefs with cultural evolutionary theory.
      aug:
        au:
          Vaesen, Krist
          Houkes, Wybo
        affil: Philosophy & Ethics, University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven The Netherlands
      su:
        Social evolution
        Anthropologists
        Archaeologists
        Scientists
        Empirical research
        Multiagent systems
      sug:
        subj:
          Social evolution
          Anthropologists
          Archaeologists
          Scientists
          Empirical research
          Multiagent systems
      ab: Evolutionary anthropologists and archaeologists have been considerably successful in modelling the cumulative evolution of culture, of technological skills and knowledge in particular. Recently, one of these models has been introduced in the philosophy of science by De Cruz and De Smedt (Philos Stud 157:411-429, ), in an attempt to demonstrate that scientists may collectively come to hold more truth-approximating beliefs, despite the cognitive biases which they individually are known to be subject to. Here we identify a major shortcoming in that attempt: De Cruz & De Smedt's mathematical model makes one particularly strong tractability assumption that causes the model to largely miss its target (namely, truth accumulation in science), and that moreover conflicts with empirical observations. The second, more constructive part of the paper presents an alternative, agent-based model, which allows one to much better examine the conditions for scientific progress and decline.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2014. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2014
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N