Relational and item-specific influences on generate-recognize processes in recall.
The generate-recognize model and the relational-item-specific distinction are two approaches to explaining recall. In this study, we consider the two approaches in concert. Following Jacoby and Hollingshead ( Journal of Memory and Language 29:433-454, ), we implemented a production task and a recogn...
| Publicado en: | Memory & Cognition Vol. 42; no. 2; pp. 198 - 212 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Feb2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=94344019&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 94344019 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0090502X MEG jtl: Memory & Cognition issn: 0090502X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Feb2014 vid: 42 iid: 2 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 94344019 10.3758/s13421-013-0341-6 ppf: 198 ppct: 14 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 325KB tig: atl: Relational and item-specific influences on generate-recognize processes in recall. aug: au: Guynn, Melissa McDaniel, Mark Strosser, Garrett Ramirez, Juan Castleberry, Erica Arnett, Kristen affil: Department of Psychology, New Mexico State University, MSC 3452 Las Cruces 88003-8001 USA Department of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis USA Department of Psychology, Southern Utah University, Cedar City USA su: Analysis of variance Memory Task performance Distraction Mathematics Data analysis software Descriptive statistics sug: subj: Analysis of variance Memory Task performance Distraction Mathematics Data analysis software Descriptive statistics keyword: Memory models Recall Recognition Memory models Recall Recognition ab: The generate-recognize model and the relational-item-specific distinction are two approaches to explaining recall. In this study, we consider the two approaches in concert. Following Jacoby and Hollingshead ( Journal of Memory and Language 29:433-454, ), we implemented a production task and a recognition task following production (1) to evaluate whether generation and recognition components were evident in cued recall and (2) to gauge the effects of relational and item-specific processing on these components. An encoding task designed to augment item-specific processing (anagram-transposition) produced a benefit on the recognition component (Experiments 1-3) but no significant benefit on the generation component (Experiments 1-3), in the context of a significant benefit to cued recall. By contrast, an encoding task designed to augment relational processing (category-sorting) did produce a benefit on the generation component (Experiment 3). These results converge on the idea that in recall, item-specific processing impacts a recognition component, whereas relational processing impacts a generation component. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|