The Real Combination Problem: Panpsychism, Micro-Subjects, and Emergence.

Taking their motivation from the perceived failure of the reductive physicalist project concerning consciousness, panpsychists ascribe subjectivity to fundamental material entities in order to account for macro-consciousness. But there exists an unresolved tension within the mainstream panpsychist p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Erkenntnis Vol. 79; no. 1; pp. 19 - 45
Main Author: Coleman, Sam
Format: Article
Published: Springer Nature Feb2014
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=94378263&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 94378263
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01650106
        5KZ
      jtl: Erkenntnis
      issn: 01650106
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2014
      vid: 79
      iid: 1
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        94378263
        10.1007/s10670-013-9431-x
      ppf: 19
      ppct: 26
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 256KB
      tig:
        atl: The Real Combination Problem: Panpsychism, Micro-Subjects, and Emergence.
      aug:
        au: Coleman, Sam
        affil: Department of Philosophy, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9AB UK
      su:
        Panpsychism
        Motivation (Psychology)
        Consciousness
        Subjectivity
        Seriousness (Attitude)
        Neutral monism
      sug:
        subj:
          Panpsychism
          Motivation (Psychology)
          Consciousness
          Subjectivity
          Seriousness (Attitude)
          Neutral monism
      ab: Taking their motivation from the perceived failure of the reductive physicalist project concerning consciousness, panpsychists ascribe subjectivity to fundamental material entities in order to account for macro-consciousness. But there exists an unresolved tension within the mainstream panpsychist position, the seriousness of which has yet to be appreciated. I capture this tension as a dilemma, and offer advice to panpsychists on how to resolve it. The dilemma is as follows: Panpsychists take the micro-material realm to feature phenomenal properties, plus micro-subjects to whom these properties belong. However, it is impossible to explain the generation of a macro-subject (like one of us) in terms of the assembly of micro-subjects, for, as I show, subjects cannot combine. Therefore the panpsychist explanatory project is derailed by the insistence that the world's ultimate material constituents are subjects of experience. The panpsychist faces a choice of giving up her explanatory ambitions, or of giving up the claim that the ultimates are subjects. I argue that the latter option is preferable, leading to neutral monism, on which phenomenal qualities are irreducible but subjects are reducible. So panpsychists should be neutral monists.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Erkenntnis is a copyright of Springer, 2014. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Erkenntnis
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2014
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N