Empirical Evidence on Inflation Expectations in the New Keynesian Phillips Curve.

We review the main identification strategies and empirical evidence on the role of expectations in the New Keynesian Phillips curve, paying particular attention to the issue of weak identification. Our goal is to provide a clear understanding of the role of expectations that integrates across the di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Economic Literature Vol. 52; no. 1; pp. 124 - 189
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Economic Association Mar2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=94870990&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 94870990
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00220515
        JEL
      jtl: Journal of Economic Literature
      issn: 00220515
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2014
      vid: 52
      iid: 1
      pid: 22
      pub: American Economic Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        94870990
        10.1257/jel.52.1.124
      ppf: 124
      ppct: 65
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Empirical Evidence on Inflation Expectations in the New Keynesian Phillips Curve.
      aug:
      su:
        Economic equilibrium
        Price inflation
        Unemployment
        Rational expectations (Economic theory)
        Demand function
        Phillips curve
      sug:
        subj:
          Economic equilibrium
          Price inflation
          Unemployment
          Rational expectations (Economic theory)
          Demand function
          Phillips curve
      ab: We review the main identification strategies and empirical evidence on the role of expectations in the New Keynesian Phillips curve, paying particular attention to the issue of weak identification. Our goal is to provide a clear understanding of the role of expectations that integrates across the different papers and specifications in the literature. We discuss the properties of the various limited-information econometric methods used in the literature and provide explanations of why they produce conflicting results. Using a common dataset and a flexible empirical approach, we find that researchers are faced with substantial specification uncertainty, as different combinations of various a priori reasonable specification choices give rise to a vast set of point estimates. Moreover, given a specification, estimation is subject to considerable sampling uncertainty due to weak identification. We highlight the assumptions that seem to matter most for identification and the configuration of point estimates. We conclude that the literature has reached a limit on how much can be learned about the New Keynesian Phillips curve from aggregate macroeconomic time series. New identification approaches and new datasets are needed to reach an empirical consensus. (JEL C51, D84, E12, E24, E31)
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N