WHAT HAVE I DONE?
An externalist view of intention is developed on broadly Wittgensteinian grounds, and applied to show that the classic Thomist doctrine of double effect, though it has good uses in casuistry, has also been overused because of the internalism about intention that has generally been presupposed by its...
| Publicado en: | Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy no. 38; pp. 86 - 113 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy
2013
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=94925807&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 94925807 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 17335566 77X1 jtl: Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy issn: 17335566 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2013 iid: 38 pid: 49926 pub: Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy artinfo: ui: 94925807 10.13153/diam.38.2013.539 ppf: 86 ppct: 27 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 614KB tig: atl: WHAT HAVE I DONE? aug: au: Chappell, Timothy su: Thomas, Aquinas, Saint, ca. 1225-1274 Applied ethics Double effect (Ethics) Philosophy of mind Christian ethics sug: subj: Thomas, Aquinas, Saint, ca. 1225-1274 Applied ethics Double effect (Ethics) Philosophy of mind Christian ethics keyword: double effect externalism intention Thomas Aquinas Wittgenstein ab: An externalist view of intention is developed on broadly Wittgensteinian grounds, and applied to show that the classic Thomist doctrine of double effect, though it has good uses in casuistry, has also been overused because of the internalism about intention that has generally been presupposed by its users. We need a good criterion of what counts as the content of our intentional actions; I argue, again on Wittgensteinian grounds, that the best criterion comes not from foresight, nor from foresight plus some degree of probability, nor from any metaphysics of "closeness", but simply from our ordinary shared understanding of what counts as doing a given action, and what does not. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy is the property of Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy holder: Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy dt: @attributes: year: 2013 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|