Seeing the Forest for the Trees: An Atlas of the Politics-Administration Dichotomy.
Recent years have seen attempts to make sense of the politics-administration dichotomy. Triangulating among historical research, empirical observations, new models of interaction between politicians and administrators, and the division of the literature into 'schools,' novel ways of understanding an...
| Publicado en: | Public Administration Review Vol. 74; no. 2; pp. 156 - 157 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Mar2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=94990118&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 94990118 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00333352 PBA jtl: Public Administration Review issn: 00333352 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Mar2014 vid: 74 iid: 2 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 94990118 10.1111/puar.12163 ppf: 156 ppct: 1 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 1.5MB tig: atl: Seeing the Forest for the Trees: An Atlas of the Politics-Administration Dichotomy. aug: au: Georgiou, Ion affil: Fundação Getulio Vargas, Brazil su: Public administration Political science Political planning System analysis Organizational governance sug: subj: Public administration Political science Political planning Other General Government Support System analysis Organizational governance ab: Recent years have seen attempts to make sense of the politics-administration dichotomy. Triangulating among historical research, empirical observations, new models of interaction between politicians and administrators, and the division of the literature into 'schools,' novel ways of understanding and examining the dichotomy have developed. These have been largely thematic and have revealed the extent of a literature spanning more than 120 years. Because of its size, a complementary structural analysis of the literature now not only is conceivably useful but also can offer means for approaching it. This article offers an atlas-that is, a series of visual maps, accompanied by associated statistics and interpretations-that can assist researchers in their travels through the territory of the dichotomy. Ten ways of tackling the literature are presented, culminating in an initial reading list that covers the breadth of dichotomy research, thus providing an epistemological foundation for those who wish to enter the territory. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|