Duhem, Quine, and the multiplicity of scientific tests.

Focuses on the Duhem-Quine holistic theses. What they did not assert; String model of scientific tests; Ways of dealing with holism; Multiplicity of tests versus the wholeness of theory; How theoretical systems react to tests.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophy of Science Vol. 61; no. 4; pp. 608 - 629
Autor principal: Balashov, Yuri
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cambridge University Press Dec94
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=9501234104&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 9501234104
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318248
        PSC
      jtl: Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00318248
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec94
      vid: 61
      iid: 4
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        9501234104
        10.1086/289825
      ppf: 608
      ppct: 21
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.9MB
      tig:
        atl: Duhem, Quine, and the multiplicity of scientific tests.
      aug:
        au: Balashov, Yuri
      su:
        Holism
        Philosophy of science
      sug:
        subj:
          Holism
          Philosophy of science
      ab: Focuses on the Duhem-Quine holistic theses. What they did not assert; String model of scientific tests; Ways of dealing with holism; Multiplicity of tests versus the wholeness of theory; How theoretical systems react to tests.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy of Science
      holder: Cambridge University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 1994
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N