AVOIDING THE PERIL OF PUBLISHING QUALITATIVE SCHOLARSHIP IN PREDATORY JOURNALS.
Scholarly communication is caught between the traditions of the past and the possibilities of the future. Specifically, scholarly open-access publishing is enabling greater access to research but, at the same time, is enabling an abundance of low quality publishers and an apparent increase in author...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research Vol. 8; no. 1; pp. 1 - 13 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, LLC
Fall2013
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=95101177&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 95101177 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 19353308 44W1 jtl: Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research issn: 19353308 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Fall2013 vid: 8 iid: 1 pid: 99754 pub: Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, LLC artinfo: ui: 95101177 ppf: 1 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 200KB tig: atl: AVOIDING THE PERIL OF PUBLISHING QUALITATIVE SCHOLARSHIP IN PREDATORY JOURNALS. aug: au: Beall, Jeffrey affil: University of Colorado Denver su: Qualitative research Scholarly method Scholarly communication Mathematical models Scholarly publishing Periodical articles sug: subj: Qualitative research Scholarly method Book Publishers Scholarly communication Mathematical models Scholarly publishing Periodical articles ab: Scholarly communication is caught between the traditions of the past and the possibilities of the future. Specifically, scholarly open-access publishing is enabling greater access to research but, at the same time, is enabling an abundance of low quality publishers and an apparent increase in author misconduct. In this article I examine six questions that frame the current state of scholarly communication. The questions examine the gold open-access model, the differences in research cultures that make open access more popular in some regions than others, the demarcation between science and non-science, the Eurodominance of scholarly publishing, and the advantages to research that large science publishers make possible. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|