The relational integration task explains fluid reasoning above and beyond other working memory tasks.
This study aimed to evaluate how well fluid reasoning can be predicted by a task that involves the monitoring of patterns of stimuli. This task is believed to measure the effectiveness of relational integration-the process that binds mental representations into more complex relational structures. In...
| Publicado en: | Memory & Cognition Vol. 42; no. 3; pp. 448 - 464 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Apr2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=95275785&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 95275785 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0090502X MEG jtl: Memory & Cognition issn: 0090502X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Apr2014 vid: 42 iid: 3 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 95275785 10.3758/s13421-013-0366-x ppf: 448 ppct: 16 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 576KB tig: atl: The relational integration task explains fluid reasoning above and beyond other working memory tasks. aug: au: Chuderski, Adam su: Cognition Decision making Task performance Chi-squared test Research funding Short-term memory Structural equation modeling Descriptive statistics sug: subj: Cognition Decision making Task performance Chi-squared test Research funding Short-term memory Structural equation modeling Descriptive statistics keyword: Fluid reasoning Relational integration Working memory Fluid reasoning Relational integration Working memory ab: This study aimed to evaluate how well fluid reasoning can be predicted by a task that involves the monitoring of patterns of stimuli. This task is believed to measure the effectiveness of relational integration-the process that binds mental representations into more complex relational structures. In Experiments 1 and 2, the task was indeed validated as a proper measure of relational integration, since participants' performance depended on the number of bindings that had to be constructed in the diverse conditions of the task, whereas neither the number of objects to be bound nor the amount of elicited interference could affect this performance. In Experiment 3, by means of structural equation modeling and variance partitioning, the relation integration task was found to be the strongest predictor of fluid reasoning, explaining variance above and beyond the amounts accounted for by four other kinds of well-established working memory tasks. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|