NIHILISTINIS TEISINGUMAS SU RICOEURU IR DERRIDA.
This article aims to radicalize the problem of justice by proposing a theoretical hypothesis of justice, traceable only as a negative and Nihilistic experience par excellence. While drawing on Ricoeur's and Den-ida's works, the "nature" of justice is exposed in the twofold perspective - as justice a...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 85; pp. 42 - 57 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=95509731&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 95509731 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2014 vid: 85 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 95509731 ppf: 42 ppct: 15 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 10.7MB tig: atl: NIHILISTINIS TEISINGUMAS SU RICOEURU IR DERRIDA. aug: au: Šerpytytė, Rita affil: Vilniaus universiteto Religijos studijų ir tyrimų centras Universiteto g. 9/1, LT-01513 Vilnius su: Ricœur, Paul, 1913-2005 Derrida, Jacques, 1930-2004 Nihilism Justice Law (Philosophical concept) Opinion (Philosophy) sug: subj: Ricœur, Paul, 1913-2005 Derrida, Jacques, 1930-2004 Nihilism Justice Law (Philosophical concept) Opinion (Philosophy) keyword: justice law nihilism Derrida justice law nihilism nihilizmas Ricoeur teisė teisingumas ab: This article aims to radicalize the problem of justice by proposing a theoretical hypothesis of justice, traceable only as a negative and Nihilistic experience par excellence. While drawing on Ricoeur's and Den-ida's works, the "nature" of justice is exposed in the twofold perspective - as justice appearing within or beyond law. The author shows how Derrida's concept of justice emerges as "originary lack", as Diff&ance, as an interruption between justice as law and injustice. By deploying the conclusions of Deconstruction as well as Heidegger's analysis of diKq, the nihilistic take is exercised in order to verify Ricoeur's formalist interpretation of this subject. The instance of "impersonal point of view" turns out to be essential in giving a background of the formalist understanding of justice. Since this instance is conceived as an open, self-sufficient and incomplete form, through which the ambivalence and ambiguity of human being is disclosed as well as an opening to the Otherness - both universal and singular - is performed, Ricoeur's position can become a subject of nihilistic interpretation, proposing the understanding of"impersonal point of view" as "moral gap", as a crack injustice of law. Šio straipsnio tikslas yra radikalus teisingumo suprobleminimas. Straipsnyje keliama teorinė hipotezė, jog teisingumas aptinkamas vien kaip negatyvi, nihilistinė par excellence patirtis. Tam pademonstruoti pasitelkiami Ricoeuras ir Derrida. Teisingumo „prigimtis" svarstoma teisingumo kaip teisės ir teisingumo anapus teisės perspektyvoje. Parodoma, kad Derrida teisingumas iškyla kaip stygius, kaip skirtumas, kaip nuotrūkio tarp teisės įgalinamo teisingumo ir ne-teisingumo „išgyvenimas". Derrida dekonstrukcija, jos išdavomis teisingumo „idėjos" atžvilgiu bei Derrida teisingumo sąsaja su Heidegge-rio AiKq (dike) - kaip nei teisingumo, nei neteisingumo - nihilistiniu traktavimu bandoma „patikrinti" Ricoeuro teisingumo interpretaciją. Interpretuojant Ricoeuro teisingumo formalizmo konceptą, atskleidžiamas nevienareikšmis formalizmo pobūdis. Parodoma, jog ypač svarbi tampa tam tikra formalizmo prasmė, kurią įgyja rikioriškoji „nepersonalaus požiūrio taško" instancija. Ji kaip neišbaigta forma, kadangi nėra uždara ir savipakankama, orientuoja j žmogiškosios situacijos dvilypumą ir dviprasmiškumą, j tokią žmogiškosios kitybės pagavą, kuri būtų universali ir singuliari sykiu. Būtent tokioje perspektyvoje Ricoeuro teisingumą galima aptikti kaip nihilistinį, t. y. „nepersonalus požiūrio taškas"yra galimas traktuoti kaip moralinis plyšys, kaip moralinis įtrūkis teisės teisingume. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: Lithuanian refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2014 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|