SĄVOKOS CHORA PERMĄSTYMAS DERRIDA FILOSOFIJOJErTIKĖJIMO BE ONTOTEOLOGIJOS DOMINAVIMO GALIMYBĖ.

The article deals with Derrida's interpretation of the platonic notion of chōra. Considering this term, Derrida questions the ontotheological image of Deity and its influence on the religious sphere which is inseparable from knowledge. First of all, the notion of chōra, which could be described as a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Problems / Problemos Vol. 85; pp. 118 - 130
Autor principal: Rudžianskaitė, Ieva
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Vilnius University 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=95509737&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 95509737
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13921126
        3D4C
      jtl: Problems / Problemos
      issn: 13921126
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2014
      vid: 85
      pid: 16037
      pub: Vilnius University
    artinfo:
      ui:
        95509737
        10.15388/problemos.2014.0.2917
      ppf: 118
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 8.8MB
      tig:
        atl: SĄVOKOS CHORA PERMĄSTYMAS DERRIDA FILOSOFIJOJErTIKĖJIMO BE ONTOTEOLOGIJOS DOMINAVIMO GALIMYBĖ.
      aug:
        au: Rudžianskaitė, Ieva
        affil: Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto Filosofijos katedra K. Donelaičio g. 52, LT-44244 Kaun
      su:
        Notions (Philosophy)
        Derrida, Jacques, 1930-2004
        Faith
        Theology & philosophy
        Discourse analysis
        Atheism
        Gods
      sug:
        subj:
          Notions (Philosophy)
          Derrida, Jacques, 1930-2004
          Faith
          Theology & philosophy
          Discourse analysis
          Atheism
          Gods
      keyword:
        apophatic discourse
        faith
        ontotheology
        unknowin
        apofatinis diskursas
        apophatic discourse
        chorą
        faith
        nežinojimas
        ontoteologija
        ontotheology
        tikėjimas
        unknowin
      ab:
        The article deals with Derrida's interpretation of the platonic notion of chōra. Considering this term, Derrida questions the ontotheological image of Deity and its influence on the religious sphere which is inseparable from knowledge. First of all, the notion of chōra, which could be described as a 'foreign body' in the logocentric tradition, is overviewed. Further, negative expressions of the language - hyperousiological and choral are analyzed, showing that in Plato's Timaeus the possibility of two forms of apophatic discourse has appeared. The analysis reveals that the structure of hyperousiological discourse expresses the ontotheological hierarchical order whereas the choral form is in relation to the possibility of multiplicities of modes and decentration of discourses. The results of this investigation show that the role of faith in these negative forms is perceived very differently. The Deity is described as a 'Being beyond being' in the hyperousiological form, whereas choral discourse has no cognitive content of faith. On the other hand, faith as such is undeniable, even if it is closely connected to atheism as doubt. In this way, the interplay between faith and atheism appears as a moment of unknowing, which is inseparable from the concept of chōra.
        Straipsnyje aptariama Jacques'o Derrida interpretuojama platoniškoji choros sąvoka. Per-mąstydamas šį terminą, Derrida kvestionuoja ontoteologinį Dievybės įvaizdį ir jo įtaką religinei sferai, kuri neatsiejama nuo žinojimo. Pirmiausia apžvelgiama choros sąvoka, kurią galėtume pavadinti lo-gocentrinės tradicijos „svetimkūniu“. Taip pat analizuojami negatyviosios kalbos raiškos būdai: hiperou-siologinis ir chorinis, parodant, jog Platono „Timajuje" išryškėja dviejų apofatinio diskurso formų galimybė. Atskleidžiama, jog hiperousiologinė diskurso struktūra perteikia ontoteologinį hierarchinį tvarkos modelį, o chorinė forma turėtų būti siejama su modelių daugialypiškumo bei diskursų išsicentravimo galimybe. Galiausiai išryškinamas tikėjimo vaidmens nevienareikšmiškumas šiose negatyviose formose. Priešingai nei hiperousiologinis kalbėjimo būdas, kuriame Dievybė apibūdinama kaip „Būtis anapus būties“, chorinis neatveria jokio pažintinio tikėjimo turinio, kita vertus, pats tikėjimas nepaneigiamas, net jeigu jis glaudžiai susijęs su ateizmu kaip abejone. Tokiu būdu tikėjimo ir ateizmo sąveika atsiskleidžia kaip nežinojimo momentas, kuris neatsiejamas nuo sąvokos chorą.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: Lithuanian
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Problems / Problemos
      holder: Vilnius University
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2014
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N