QUENTINAS MEILLASSOUX IR RADIKALI MENO (NE)GALIMYBĖ.

This paper addresses the problematic relationship between Speculative Realism and art. Although the newly-born movement became popular among curators and artists, one finds no space left for legitimization of creative practices in Quentin Meillassoux's "After Finitude". By criticizing the so-called...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Problems / Problemos Vol. 85; pp. 153 - 167
Autor principal: Sabolius, Kristupas
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Vilnius University 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=95509740&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 95509740
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13921126
        3D4C
      jtl: Problems / Problemos
      issn: 13921126
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2014
      vid: 85
      pid: 16037
      pub: Vilnius University
    artinfo:
      ui:
        95509740
        10.15388/problemos.2014.0.2914
      ppf: 153
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 10MB
      tig:
        atl: QUENTINAS MEILLASSOUX IR RADIKALI MENO (NE)GALIMYBĖ.
      aug:
        au: Sabolius, Kristupas
        affil: Vilniaus universiteto Filosofijos katedra Universiteto g. 9/1, LT-01513 Vilnius
      su:
        Meillassoux, Quentin, 1967-
        Radicalism
        Ontology
        Rationalism
        Realism
        Autonomy (Philosophy)
      sug:
        subj:
          Meillassoux, Quentin, 1967-
          Radicalism
          Ontology
          Rationalism
          Realism
          Autonomy (Philosophy)
      keyword:
        art
        contingency
        speculative realism
        virtuality
        art
        contingency
        kontingencija
        menas
        speculative realism
        spekuliatyvusis realizmas
        virtuality
        virtualumas
      ab:
        This paper addresses the problematic relationship between Speculative Realism and art. Although the newly-born movement became popular among curators and artists, one finds no space left for legitimization of creative practices in Quentin Meillassoux's "After Finitude". By criticizing the so-called correlationism which privileges the necessary binding between being and thinking, Speculative Realism would not grant art a possibility of the access to the reality of things-in-themselves. By creating something new, artistic practices constantly violate the absolute autonomy of the world. On the other hand, if rejected the reductive rationalism of speculation, the principle of "the necessity of contingency", as postulated by Meillassoux, could provide some guidelines for artistic take on the issue of reality. Through the radicalization of contingency in creative practices and the restitution of the value of the virtual, one could perform the transformation into Otherness and not-speculative confrontation with the realm of Hyper-Chaos.
        Šiame straipsnyje nagrinėjamas spekuliatyviojo realizmo ir meno santykis. Teigiama, kad nors naujasisjudėjimas išpopuliarėjo kuratorių ir menininkų kontekstuose, vienojo pradininkų Quentino Meillassoux knygoje „Po baigtinybės" siūloma pozicija nepalieka galimybių paties meno legitimavimui. Spekuliatyvieji realistai stengiasi įveikti koreliacionizmo prieigą, pagal kurią tarp mąstymo ir būties egzistuoja būtinas ryšys. Kartu tokia pozicija nenumato galimybės meninėms praktikoms pasiekti realybės sferą - sukurdamas ką nors nauja, menininkas nuolatos pažeidžia absoliutaus pasaulio autonomiją. Tačiau atmetus spekuliatyvųjį realizmą grindžiantį reduktyvų racionalizmą, Meillassoux postuluojamas „kontingencijos būtinybės" principas gali tapti meninės prieigos orientyru. Kūrybinėse praktikose įgyvendinamas kontingencijų radikalizavimas gali pasiūlyti nespekuliatyvią akistatą su Hiper-Chaosu, virtua-lybės plotmėje aktualizuodamas „virsmo kitu"perspektyvą.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: Lithuanian
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Problems / Problemos
      holder: Vilnius University
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2014
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N